Closed shinaoka closed 2 years ago
Dear @shinaoka,
Thank you for pointing out the cpp2py issue! This is now fixed in https://github.com/TRIQS/cpp2py/commit/3c2fe467352a2faec713443237926573cb6af5f0
I am not aware of any aarch64 TRIQS Dockerfile, but it would be great to know if you run into any further issues. Please let us know!
Note however that we have successfully built the current TRIQS/unstable branch
on a compute node with Fujitsu FX700 CPU's using the armv8.2-a+sve
instruction set.
Thank you for the fix and the information.
I've successfully built triqs
, triqs/cthyb
, triqs/dftools
, triqs/hubbard-I
on ubuntu:jammy
.
https://github.com/shinaoka/docker/blob/main/triqs3_aarch64/Dockerfile
Glad that this worked without issues! I am closing this, reopen if needed.
Summary
Support/test on aarch64-linux
Motivation
It'd be nice if we can run aarch64 linux on a M1 macbook using docker for development because the enumeration of x86_64 is slow.
Implementation
I've tried to build a docker image for TRIQS. But, cpp2py does not seem to support aarch64.
Adding a new search path in FindPython.cmake seems to fix the issue: https://github.com/TRIQS/cpp2py/blob/2.0.x/cmake/FindPython.cmake#L114
I want to first know if someone is already porting TRIQS to aarch64.