According to German Wikipedia, the tēti symbol should be identical to the piḷḷaiyār cuḻi, although from looking at a manuscript it seems different. Should we make a <g ref="teti"/> symbol that looks like a piḷḷaiyār cuḻi, but is called "tēti" or "day"? See the explicit of Indien 309 for an example of the mācam symbol.
I also coded the initial piḷḷaiyār cuḻi on the front woodcover as #pcs, although it is not specified whether it's long or short.
According to German Wikipedia, the tēti symbol should be identical to the piḷḷaiyār cuḻi, although from looking at a manuscript it seems different. Should we make a
<g ref="teti"/>symbol that looks like a piḷḷaiyār cuḻi, but is called "tēti" or "day"? See the explicit of Indien 309 for an example of the mācam symbol.I also coded the initial piḷḷaiyār cuḻi on the front woodcover as #pcs, although it is not specified whether it's long or short.