Open manufrancis opened 1 year ago
For issue 1: maybe we should be using standard TEI <fw>
and <body>
instead of <milestone>
. It would also make it easier to process.
For issue 2/3: I usually think of the completion statement as separate from and preceding the colophon...
For issue 4: Yes this is an ongoing struggle...
Here is one way to structure a transcription that is TEI-like and would solve a lot of our problems:
<text>
<front>
<fw place="left-margin">[blessing in the left margin]</fw>
<docTitle>[title of the work as written on the title page]</docTitle>
</front>
<body>
<milestone n="1r" unit="folio"/>
<fw place="left-margin">[blessing in the left margin]</fw>
<lb n="1"/>[main text]
</body>
<back>
[if there's a back title page or something]
</back>
</text>
I am progressively updating our XML files adding, wherever missing, the tag
<milestone unit="main-text-area"/>
. Can you in set our display so that when a<seg function="...">
is imported in the Paratexts display the<pb>
and the<milestone>
are both displayed?See for instance, NAF 9114, where it would be nice to have the
<pb>
which bears the@facs
also displayed:Or Indien 273:
The tricky thing is that we have several situation to handle, e.g.
<pb>
<seg function="paratext"><milestone unit="main-text-area"/>
<lb n="1"/>
[paratext]<pb>
<seg function="intertitle"><milestone unit="left-margin"/>
<lb n="1"/>
[intertitle]<seg function="..."><milestone unit="main-text-area"/>
<lb n="1"/>
[paratext]<pb>
<milestone unit="main-text-area"/>
<lb n="1-5"/><gap reason="ellipsis"/>
<seg function="...">
<lb n="6"/>
[paratext1]</seg>``<seg function="...">
[paratext2]</seg>
Maybe we should make strict rules about the placement of
<seg>
vis à vis<pb>
and<milestone>
Any suggestions?
===============
PS1: can you also display
<seg>
(when its value for@function
is either rubric, incipit, explicit, completion-statement, colophon, copy-statement, date, total-"whatever") in Contents and not in Paratexts? I guess it is implemented for most of these values.But see for instance Paratexts display of Indien 196:
===============
PS2: can you also set the display so that if a
<seg function>
is contained in another<seg function>
, it is not displayed twice. See again Indien 196, Contents: It would be nice to have here only the display of colophon (as the mouseover indicate the further<seg>
contained in).===============
PS3: I noticed strange displays in Paratexts, e.g. in Indien 22, where we do not need
Same issue in Indien 51:
and in Indien 273: