INAV 5.0 build error

[gavinlowk]

Hi

Could you help to modify the AOCODAF722MINI target files , so that it can build with a INAV 5.0

the error as below :

/src/src/main/target/AOCODAF722/target.c:31:23: error: conflicting types for 'timerHardware' 31 | const timerHardware_t timerHardware[] = { | ^~~~~ In file included from /src/src/main/target/AOCODAF722/target.c:25: /src/src/main/drivers/timer.h:137:24: note: previous declaration of 'timerHardware' was here 137 | extern timerHardware_t timerHardware[]; | ^~~~~ make[3]: [src/main/target/AOCODAF722/CMakeFiles/AOCODAF722MINI.elf.dir/build.make:726: src/main/target/AOCODAF722/CMakeFiles/AOCODAF722MINI.elf.dir/target.c.obj] Error 1 make[2]: [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:10259: src/main/target/AOCODAF722/CMakeFiles/AOCODAF722MINI.elf.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:10239: src/main/target/AOCODAF722/CMakeFiles/AOCODAF722MINI.dir/rule] Error 2 make: [Makefile:2276: AOCODAF722MINI] Error 2

[gavinlowk]

OK , I have found the problem which cause the compilation issue.

it is quit obvious , the target.c object type declaration changed on INAV 5.0 change to timerHardware_t timerHardware[] and solve the issue.

Anyway , Thanks your work on the target files

[cryptictuna]

were you able to compile a 5.0 AOCODAF722MINI hex? I found one for 4.1 but was looking for the latest.. much thanks.

[Ultraexpert]

Hey thanks to all who have contributed, I am going to try get this fc official inav5x support. Would anyone be interested in testing 5.1 hex builds

[cryptictuna]

YES!!!!!!!!!! Please forward.. have new aoc722 waiting! 😉

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2022 8:56 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

Hey thanks to all who have contributed, I am going to try get this fc official inav5x support. Would anyone be interested in testing 5.1 hex builds

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1242982295, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHQMN35NBDXBHYUM653V5XXKLANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[Ultraexpert]

Hey I tried the 4.1hex and can confirm its kindworking.gyro! anyone have another target to start for compiling 5.1??

[Ultraexpert]

YES!!!!!!!!!! Please forward.. have new aoc722 waiting! 😉 Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows From: @.> Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2022 8:56 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1) Hey thanks to all who have contributed, I am going to try get this fc official inav5x support. Would anyone be interested in testing 5.1 hex builds — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1 (comment)>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHQMN35NBDXBHYUM653V5XXKLANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

hey TUNA, I uploaded a hex for testing. I will upload a revised version when I can cross reference from others targets. https://github.com/Ultraexpert/Aocoda-rc-F7-Mini

[TSXX42mcj]

I have been using it for several months, and it works well.I found an official firmware for INAV5.0. Maybe you can try it.

在 2022-09-12 03:38:26，"Ultraexpert" @.***> 写道：

Hey I tried the 4.1hex and can confirm its not working. no gyro! anyone have a good place to start for compiling 5.1??

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

[Ultraexpert]

I have been using it for several months, and it works well.I found an official firmware for INAV5.0. Maybe you can try it. 在 2022-09-12 03:38:26，"Ultraexpert" @.> 写道： Hey I tried the 4.1hex and can confirm its not working. no gyro! anyone have a good place to start for compiling 5.1?? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.>

Hey great news! Do you have the link? I have seen and tried a 5.0 hex that is still unofficial maybe it’s the same one? https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target

[TSXX42mcj]

It's the same one.

在 2022-09-19 20:00:59，"Ultraexpert" @.***> 写道：

I have been using it for several months, and it works well.I found an official firmware for INAV5.0. Maybe you can try it. 在 2022-09-12 03:38:26，"Ultraexpert" @.> 写道： Hey I tried the 4.1hex and can confirm its not working. no gyro! anyone have a good place to start for compiling 5.1?? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.>

Hey great news! Do you have the link? I have seen and tried a 5.0 hex that is still unofficial maybe it’s the same one? https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[cryptictuna]

I am confused.. as the f722 mini IS NOT THERE… has it been rename to f7Mini? AOCODARCF722BLEhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF722BLE remove 'const' from timer definitionshttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/e6955229745b111fcac1859c1426d49241de6d6b 3 months ago AOCODARCF7DUALhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF7DUAL Update target.chttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/2f8f6f18c7a976ca0b48f2b3fe4750b875205c51 5 months ago AOCODARCF7MINIhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF7MINI Target: AOCODARCF7MINIhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/a5116c10aae81a22348e8b50b26522af78298552

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 6:14 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

It's the same one.

在 2022-09-19 20:00:59，"Ultraexpert" @.***> 写道：

I have been using it for several months, and it works well.I found an official firmware for INAV5.0. Maybe you can try it. 在 2022-09-12 03:38:26，"Ultraexpert" @.> 写道： Hey I tried the 4.1hex and can confirm its not working. no gyro! anyone have a good place to start for compiling 5.1?? ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.>

Hey great news! Do you have the link? I have seen and tried a 5.0 hex that is still unofficial maybe it’s the same one? https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target

― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1250938965, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHRUDQZJBDZ2GHU7643V7BKJ3ANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[Ultraexpert]

@cryptictuna Yes the f722 mini is the f7mini, as far as I know there is no other f7 processor from aocoda, it’s just a F722. hopefully this target will get official support for inav!

[cryptictuna]

Thank YOU.. I will give it a shot this evening.. 😊

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 8:40 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

I am confused.. as the f722 mini IS NOT THERE… has it been rename to f7Mini? AOCODARCF722BLEhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF722BLE remove 'const' from timer @.https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/e6955229745b111fcac1859c1426d49241de6d6b> 3 months ago AOCODARCF7DUALhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF7DUAL Update @.https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/2f8f6f18c7a976ca0b48f2b3fe4750b875205c51> 5 months ago AOCODARCF7MINIhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF7MINI Target: @.https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/a5116c10aae81a22348e8b50b26522af78298552> Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 6:14 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1) It's the same one. 在 2022-09-19 20:00:59，"Ultraexpert" @.> 写道： I have been using it for several months, and it works well.I found an official firmware for INAV5.0. Maybe you can try it. 在 2022-09-12 03:38:26，"Ultraexpert" @.> 写道： Hey I tried the 4.1hex and can confirm its not working. no gyro! anyone have a good place to start for compiling 5.1?? ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.> Hey great news! Do you have the link? I have seen and tried a 5.0 hex that is still unofficial maybe it’s the same one? https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.> ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1 (comment)https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1250938965>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHRUDQZJBDZ2GHU7643V7BKJ3ANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.>

Yes the f722 mini is the f7mini, as far as I know there is no other f7 processor from aocoda, it’s just a F722. hopefully this target will get official support for inav!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251117092, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHTUAQPKMUXYMVHWCS3V7B3MZANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[Ultraexpert]

@cryptictuna Excellent! Please report back & happy flying ;)

[cryptictuna]

Curious… with 5.0 I noticed that finally , they have a Props Out wizard.. Does it work without the old CLI tweaks needed like inverting yaw and Motor_inverted command prior. ? with a mamba405 I have,, the new props out wizard Did NOT work as it spazout to the moon.. I Still had to add the Motors_inverted command sadly after smashing my props to bits.. lol uggg. Inav is a finicky beast..

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 8:43 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

Thank YOU.. I will give it a shot this evening.. 😊 Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 8:40 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1) I am confused.. as the f722 mini IS NOT THERE… has it been rename to f7Mini? AOCODARCF722BLEhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF722BLE remove 'const' from timer @.@.https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/e6955229745b111fcac1859c1426d49241de6d6b>> 3 months ago AOCODARCF7DUALhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF7DUAL Update @.@.https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/2f8f6f18c7a976ca0b48f2b3fe4750b875205c51>> 5 months ago AOCODARCF7MINIhttps://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target/AOCODARCF7MINI Target: @.@.https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/commit/a5116c10aae81a22348e8b50b26522af78298552>> Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 6:14 AM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1<#1https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1>) It's the same one. 在 2022-09-19 20:00:59，"Ultraexpert" @.> 写道： I have been using it for several months, and it works well.I found an official firmware for INAV5.0. Maybe you can try it. 在 2022-09-12 03:38:26，"Ultraexpert" @.> 写道： Hey I tried the 4.1hex and can confirm its not working. no gyro! anyone have a good place to start for compiling 5.1?? ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.> Hey great news! Do you have the link? I have seen and tried a 5.0 hex that is still unofficial maybe it’s the same one? https://github.com/sensei-hacker/inav_unofficial_targets/tree/unofficial_targets/src/main/target ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.> ― Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1 (comment)<#1 (comment)https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1250938965>>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHRUDQZJBDZ2GHU7643V7BKJ3ANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.> Yes the f722 mini is the f7mini, as far as I know there is no other f7 processor from aocoda, it’s just a F722. hopefully this target will get official support for inav! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1 (comment)https://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251117092>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHTUAQPKMUXYMVHWCS3V7B3MZANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.>

Excellent! Please report back & happy flying ;)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251121752, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHQDS77EEINAV2CPZFTV7B3ZXANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[Ultraexpert]

@cryptictuna hey thanks for the info! I actually build fixed wing drones, so I don’t know what ‘props out wizard” is. I always test motor direction with the outputs tab on inav.(props off for safety) Then always do a high 5 test before every flight (just in case) I will test the cli motor_inverted command to confirm it works also. Sorry to hear about the damages to your props 😖

[cryptictuna]

Part of the hobby…Had to add those previous cli commands in 4.1.. was working good.. I made the mistake of being flash happy and jumped to 5.0 bench testing was fine.. .once armed, and off the bench and try to spool up slowly it spooled full throttle tumbleflopped spazzed out..microseconds before could disarmed slammed to ground.. etc.. so in quads.. props out is when the front two props spin “outward” away from camera, most default to Props “In” .. When flying through brush grass, leaves etc.. props ot casts the leaves aside instead of sucking em in to the cam.. etc.. previous 4.1 had no “props out” tick or wizard like BF until 5.0.. when I upgraded I was stoked. Alas.. a one ciick fix.. nope.. lol all part of the game. Cant win with every little thing..

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 3:10 PM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

@cryptictunahttps://github.com/cryptictuna hey thanks for the info! I actually build fixed wing drones, so I don’t know what ‘props out wizard” is. I always test motor direction with the outputs tab on inav.(props off for safety) Then always do a high 5 test before every flight (just in case) I will test the cli motor_inverted command to confirm it works also. Sorry to hear about the damages to your props 😖

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251551183, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHR3LMCDWUCJJNX62MDV7DJETANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[cryptictuna]

I also am a former Nitro fixed winger of the 80;s and 90;s.. ive converted a few to brushless and FVP as well.. no FC’s in the wings yet as I was always Fly by Wire.. But I do use the R24 Vario with GPS pwm ELRS receiver.. I get the GPS telemetry back to my radio with Variometer too.. so that’s enough for me.. Ive been looking into the matek LTE;s wih inav for future long range missions etc.. however.. with all the new tech emerging.. im on the fence.. like HDZero or Dji? Then with long range vtx. Im looking at 433mhz or 1.2mhz dragolink etc.. so many options.. lol

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: david @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 4:23 PM To: @.> Subject: RE: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

Part of the hobby…Had to add those previous cli commands in 4.1.. was working good.. I made the mistake of being flash happy and jumped to 5.0 bench testing was fine.. .once armed, and off the bench and try to spool up slowly it spooled full throttle tumbleflopped spazzed out..microseconds before could disarmed slammed to ground.. etc.. so in quads.. props out is when the front two props spin “outward” away from camera, most default to Props “In” .. When flying through brush grass, leaves etc.. props ot casts the leaves aside instead of sucking em in to the cam.. etc.. previous 4.1 had no “props out” tick or wizard like BF until 5.0.. when I upgraded I was stoked. Alas.. a one ciick fix.. nope.. lol all part of the game. Cant win with every little thing..

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 3:10 PM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

@cryptictunahttps://github.com/cryptictuna hey thanks for the info! I actually build fixed wing drones, so I don’t know what ‘props out wizard” is. I always test motor direction with the outputs tab on inav.(props off for safety) Then always do a high 5 test before every flight (just in case) I will test the cli motor_inverted command to confirm it works also. Sorry to hear about the damages to your props 😖

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251551183, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHR3LMCDWUCJJNX62MDV7DJETANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[cryptictuna]

Question.. are you using this AOCADA722 in a wing? Just using the S1234 pads for motor and servos? Im guessing you supply servo power directly from the bec no? do you jusge bribge the power and ground wires from the bec to the servos the the signal wire to s pads?

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 3:10 PM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

@cryptictunahttps://github.com/cryptictuna hey thanks for the info! I actually build fixed wing drones, so I don’t know what ‘props out wizard” is. I always test motor direction with the outputs tab on inav.(props off for safety) Then always do a high 5 test before every flight (just in case) I will test the cli motor_inverted command to confirm it works also. Sorry to hear about the damages to your props 😖

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251551183, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHR3LMCDWUCJJNX62MDV7DJETANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[Ultraexpert]

@cryptictuna The current build I am flying is a single tractor T-Tail plane(s720) that I had to replace the esc and flight controller(because stupid stock all in one burned out) with s1 for motor, s5(elevator) s6(ailerons) s7(rudder). Yes I power the servos in parallel from the ESC BEC, then just signal to the pads. I am going to re-maiden this week. I can post how this configuration ends up flying.

[Ultraexpert]

@cryptictuna Hey, I just saw your previous post, thanks for the info on the props out thing! I have definitely learned my lesson from not doing preflight checks. I do have twin motor setups which I experiment with ccw & cw rotating props and hadn’t thought about the leaves being pushed into the camera& cooling vents. I moved on from diy quads for now, and just buy dji pre made quads, they are truly epic robots! I prefer Fixed-wing aerobatics and like the challenge of taking on quad course circuits with a t-tail . Fixed wings are still not at that straightforward point yet with the obstacle avoidance/ active track code integration, but inav has made autonomous flight so reliable. I hope for clean open source code integration of AI soon. I build flying wings for long range & flight time, waypoint Missions. I’m glad the fixed wing community has benefited so much from advancements in quad technology. Hoping this discussion adds value to someone haha I should join the iNav Facebook page or something so we can continue sharing info!

[cryptictuna]

Sweet~! I might just attempt using this FC for a Foam wing I just finished from 3 sheets of foam board from the $ store.ive got some triple pin headers.. I’ll bridle the bottoms and middle with solder…for power and ground to the servos.. then the motor (s1 channel 1) Servo lead will supply power and ground to the rail.. I’ll solder the Signals accordingly to the fc.. then can just plug in servos and remove them easy if needed.. . .. I’ll keep you posted!>

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 6:03 PM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

@cryptictunahttps://github.com/cryptictuna The current build I am flying is a single tractor T-Tail plane(s720) that I had to replace the esc and flight controller(because stupid stock all in one burned out) with s1 for motor, s5(elevator) s6(ailerons) s7(rudder). Yes I power the servos in parallel from the ESC BEC, then just signal to the pads. I am going to re-maiden this week. I can post how this configuration ends up flying. [08636AAF-7D5D-4CC4-B36C-2E4644D46560]https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111110878/191138739-d203e0d1-9467-473e-8b0e-f9a7a7efea79.jpeg

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251691776, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHTLEVHDS67SK2ZNAEDV7D5MDANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[cryptictuna]

I too was an old school acro wing guy with Extra 300s and the old AMA..(still have it and converted to brushless ) .. lol and also currently working on a Giant scale Katana edge 540, 140cc gas conversion to Brushless.. OMG.. I picked up a bigfoot 60 ( its like a 6840 720 kv something ) it’s a monster scooter motor.. will run up 12s (48v) .. 18in Triprop.. 76in wingspan.. it’s a beast.. cant wait I will run 2 5s 5000 in series should turn it close to 18000 rpm.. that’s nutty for an 18in prop. …Kinda spendy for the lipos.. I’ll keep you posted on that one too.. It will be power hungry as I also have to run Dual push pull standard size servos for ailerons, flaps and rudder.. 8 servos just for Controls.. its coming in around 15l bs with Lipos.. on paper should push bout 27bs of thrust..almost 2-1 its kinda scary.. lol

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: @.> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 9:04 PM To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV] INAV 5.0 build error (Issue #1)

@cryptictunahttps://github.com/cryptictuna Hey, I just saw your previous post, thanks for the info on the props out thing! I have definitely learned my lesson from not doing preflight checks. I do have twin motor setups which I experiment with ccw & cw rotating props and hadn’t thought about the leaves being pushed into the camera& cooling vents. I moved on from diy quads for now, and just buy dji pre made quads, they are truly epic robots! I prefer Fixed-wing aerobatics and like the challenge of taking on quad course circuits with a t-tail . Fixed wings are still not at that straightforward point yet with the obstacle avoidance/ active track code integration, but inav has made autonomous flight so reliable. I hope for clean open source code integration of AI soon. I build flying wings for long range & flight time, waypoint Missions. I’m glad the fixed wing community has benefited so much from advancements in quad technology. Hoping this discussion adds value to someone haha I should join the iNav Facebook page or something so we can continue sharing info!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/TSXX42mcj/AOCODAF722MINI_INAV/issues/1#issuecomment-1251778752, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVKINHSGRZIBJBTZBLCSS6LV7ESUDANCNFSM52FQCEPA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[Ultraexpert]

@cryptictuna Incredible, Sounds great!

[Ultraexpert]

Soldered everything down accordingly and no response from servos. Motor working only from iNav gui. I see the rx channel values moving correctly in inav. Why won’t it just work!

[Ultraexpert]

So can confirm working motor and servos with 4.1 target. I couldn’t get the gps to work but will try again. 5.0 target I get no response from servos or motor with rx but response from the inav gui. I’m not sure what to change?

[Ultraexpert]

@TSXX42mcj Your 4.1 hex is the only one I can get working for servos. Are those target files listed build the 4 motor hex? Do you have the 5.0 one you figured out?

[cryptictuna]

hey TUNA, I uploaded a hex for testing. I will upload a revised version when I can cross reference from others targets. https://github.com/Ultraexpert/Aocoda-rc-F7-Mini

page not found:(