Closed zhimin-z closed 1 year ago
Thank you for your suggestion!
SEML actually provides a bunch of additional tracking that Sacred doesn't offer, and makes using tracking with Sacred much more convenient. So I think this label is still well-motivated.
What would your suggestions for labels be? :)
Thank you for your suggestion!
SEML actually provides a bunch of additional tracking that Sacred doesn't offer, and makes using tracking with Sacred much more convenient. So I think this label is still well-motivated.
What would your suggestions for labels be? :)
Thanks for your quick reply, @gasteigerjo Admittedly, SEML is an amazing tool that complements Sacred. Since it deals with the coordination of parallel experiments, why not label it with "experiment-orchestration"? What do you think? :)
That's a great suggestion! Unfortunately, it isn't a common label. Can you find something along those lines that is a commonly used label?
That's a great suggestion! Unfortunately, it isn't a common label. Can you find something along those lines that is a commonly used label?
How about using this one? https://github.com/topics/orchestration I am sure if we use this one, the labels would suit much better.
I've added orchestration
and experiment-manager
. I've kept experiment-tracking
since I feel like that's also an aspect of this library. But the tags should highlight the different aspects much better now. Thank you! :)
This project aims for a tool rather than an experiment-tracking tool like sacred, I wonder if the repo holder minds tweaking the topic labels a bit.