Open MaraChequer opened 1 year ago
Hi Jeff, these are the word documents for the course: U1-LDRS 672-v.29.03.23.docx U2-LDRS 672-v.29.03.23.docx U3-LDRS 672-v.29.03.23.docx U4-LDRS 672-v.29.03.23.docx U5-LDRS 672-v.29.03.23.docx U6-LDRS 672-v.29.03.23.docx
Link to the google drive https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/197RKynltVMlzG3Neps66VjuaOWuvdybk?usp=share_link
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Hi @MaraChequer, I've done the first unit. Let me know if the style will work for you. The doc files will work fine. Only needing to adjust headings. I removed the table for the activity checklist. Let me know if you'd prefer to keep it.
@MaraChequer The 6 units are up.
Oh sorry for the late reply Jeff. Thank you so much!
Oh sorry for the late reply Jeff. Thank you so much!
@MaraChequer Welcome!
Hello, not urgent, I'll leave it here so I can keep track of changes. Unit 1 - Topic 2 content to be replaced by:
Topic 2: Evolution of Diplomacy Scott-Smith, G. Special issue: the evolution of diplomacy. Place Brand Public Dipl 14, 1–3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-018-0095-9
In the 2018 special issue on the evolution of diplomacy, Giles Scott-Smith discusses the transformative shift in diplomatic studies, largely due to the revolution in communications of the early twenty-first century. Scott-Smith references Jan Melissen's proposition that the expansion of public diplomacy now dominates diplomatic research agendas, suggesting an 'upgrade' or 'reboot' of diplomatic practice. The rise of connectivity and public opinion has changed the landscape of global interactions, forcing diplomacy to adapt.
Scott-Smith emphasizes the crucial role of states in diplomacy, despite the shifts in power dynamics and modes of communication. The growth of public diplomacy does not negate the importance of state-led initiatives; instead, it necessitates an evolution in their operation. Yet, he also acknowledges the emergence of 'diplomacy' — a form of diplomacy characterized by city-led efforts, like the response to climate change, highlighting the increased 'localization' of international relations.
Further, Scott-Smith highlights the concept of 'anti diplomacy,' referring to the revolutionary drive to overcome the limitations of the nation-state to create a peaceful, post-state space. Antidiplomacy seeks to transcend the divisions that underpin traditional diplomacy, thereby potentially undermining it. Yet, this concept also prompts contemplation about the forces that may eventually lead to its evolution.
The author acknowledges different outlooks on the adaptation of diplomatic practice, exemplified in essays by Pigman, La Cour, Pamment, and Wong and Li. These scholars consider shifts in trade diplomacy, changes in the interpretation of 'the public' in public diplomacy, and significant transformations in the public diplomacy apparatuses of Britain and China. In summary, Scott-Smith's article underscores the need for improvement in the practices of diplomacy, with an emphasis on clearer messaging, improved presentation, and better coordination of participants. The evolution of diplomacy aligns with the increasing potentials of public diplomacy. Nonetheless, Scott-Smith also reminds readers to pay attention to the pitfalls, gaps, and silences that persist in diplomatic discourse, which may offer unique insights into the evolution of diplomacy.
Hello @MaraChequer Unit 1 topic 2 contents have already been updated.
Changes request | For production
LDRS 672 Here is the list to complete for this course:
2. Remove Assessment from each Unit:
Question for production: Will this be the final URL for this course? https://effective-broccoli-19q5kg5.pages.github.io/
Unit 2:
Unit 3: -in learning activity, Please replace all content with the following:
Watch "Diplomatic Relations and International Law" by the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law - In this video, Ms. Eileen Denza Former Visiting Professor, UCL discusses the legal framework for diplomatic relations and the role of international law in regulating diplomatic interactions between nations. The video covers the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which sets out the rights and obligations of diplomats, and the different forms of diplomatic representation, including embassies, consulates, and missions to international organizations.
Part 1 https://legal.un.org/avl/ls/Denza_DCL_video_1.html (41 min)
Part 2 https://legal.un.org/avl/ls/Denza_DCL_video_2.html (22:28 min)
Note that the learning activities in this course are ungraded, unless specified. They are designed to help you succeed in your assessments in this course, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them.
Unit 4: -In Learning activity: Replace all content with the following
Watch "Professor Paul Reynolds' presentation on 'Summit Diplomacy: Some Lessons from History for 21st Century Leaders' delves into the intricacies and evolution of top-level diplomatic meetings throughout history. Reynolds emphasizes the pivotal role these high-stakes meetings have played in shaping the global political landscape, from peace treaties to the onset or averting of wars. Drawing from rich historical events, he illustrates the complexities and nuances leaders face, underscoring the importance of preparation, understanding the cultural and political context, and the art of negotiation. For today's leaders, the lessons from the past serve as both warnings and guides, emphasizing the significance of diplomacy and dialogue in our increasingly interconnected world."
Summit Diplomacy: Some Lessons from History for 21st Century Leaders - Professor Paul Reynolds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTEFyPhDMtU (45 min)
Note that the learning activities in this course are ungraded, unless specified. They are designed to help you succeed in your assessments in this course, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them.
Unit 5: -In Learning activity: Replace all content with the following
Watch "Diplomacy in the Absence of Relations: The US Experience with Iran" by the Council of Foreign Relations - In this video, former US Secretary of State John Kerry discusses the US experience with diplomacy in the absence of formal diplomatic relations, using the case of US-Iran relations as an example. He talks about the role of back-channel communications, mediation, and other forms of indirect diplomacy in fostering dialogue and building trust between nations. The video also covers the challenges and opportunities of such diplomacy and its potential to help resolve conflicts and promote peace.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocQ9iNw3rkc (1 hr)
Note that the learning activities in this course are ungraded, unless specified. They are designed to help you succeed in your assessments in this course, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them.
Unit 6:
Learning activity - Please replace all content in activity/
For this activity, you will watch a recommended video link on the subject of Applications of Diplomacy in China and India.
Introduction: Vijay Gokhale, Shivshankar Menon, and Kanti Prasad Bajpai, with their vast experiences and insights, offer significant perspectives on India's negotiation strategies with China. While I don't have direct access to every publication they've produced or every statement they've made, based on my training data up to September 2021, here is a general understanding of how India negotiates with China based on the expertise of such figures:
Bilateral Diplomacy: India and China have established multiple dialogue mechanisms to address various issues. These include strategic dialogues, defense and security talks, and more routine diplomatic engagements at various levels. This ensures open channels of communication even during times of tension.
Understanding Core Interests: Both countries recognize the importance of understanding each other's core interests and sensitivities. They often strive to keep contentious issues, like the border dispute, separate from other cooperative initiatives.
Balancing Firmness and Flexibility: Given the long-standing border disputes and strategic competition, India often takes a firm stance on its territorial integrity and sovereignty. However, there's also flexibility in addressing non-core issues and exploring areas of mutual interest.
Multilateral Engagements: Both nations are part of several multilateral forums like BRICS, SCO, and the RIC (Russia, India, China) trilateral mechanism. These forums allow them to engage in a broader context, diluting bilateral tensions and enhancing cooperative endeavors.
Trade and Economic Engagements: Despite political and strategic differences, India and China have robust trade relations. Both sides often negotiate to balance trade, enhance market access, and boost investment.
Building People-to-People Ties: Recognizing the role of cultural and educational exchanges, both countries have initiatives to promote tourism, academic exchanges, and cultural programs. This is seen as a way to build mutual trust among the populace of both nations.
Studying Each Other's Strategic Culture: Both Menon and Gokhale have emphasized understanding China's strategic culture and thinking. Knowing the historical, cultural, and philosophical underpinnings of Chinese decision-making helps in predicting and negotiating with Beijing.
Crisis Management Mechanisms: Given the occasional flare-ups along the border, both countries have set up hotlines and regular meetings between border personnel to manage and defuse crisis.
Engaging on Global Issues: India and China, being two major developing countries, often collaborate on global issues like climate change, trade norms, and reform of international institutions.
While these are general strategies, specific negotiations depend on the issue at hand, the prevailing geo-political climate, and domestic considerations. The collective experiences of Gokhale, Menon, and Bajpai provide a deeper understanding of these nuances in India's approach to China.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igckmfd6zew (2 hours)
Note that the learning activities in this course are ungraded, unless specified. They are designed to help you succeed in your assessments in this course, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them.
Hello @MaraChequer all these edits have been made. Here is the link to the course book: https://effective-broccoli-19q5kg5.pages.github.io/.
Thank you @MeeksonHundoo.
Thank you for raising concern about LA 4.3 title, you are correct. I think the title should be: '"Summit Diplomacy Through Time: Insights for 21st Century Leaders'
yw @MaraChequer. This is done
Hi production team. What is the book link for this course? this one is not working anymore.
Thanks in advance
Hi production team. What is the book link for this course? this one is not working anymore.
Thanks in advance
Hi @MaraChequer it looks like the book was changed to public so that it could be embedded in Moodle. Here is the new link. https://ma-lead.github.io/ldrs672/
Thank you Jeff!
I am near the end with changes for this course book I believe. My apologies because I am coming with these changes in pieces, It has been challenging to get all of this in one document from the SME. He has been wanting to see his work shown in the book to continue working.
All units are missing -Checking your Learning- Please add the content listed below:
Before you move on to the next unit, you may want to check to make sure that you are able to:
Before you move on to the next unit, you may want to check to make sure that you are able to:
Before you move on to the next unit, you may want to check to make sure that you are able to:
Before you move on to the next unit, you may want to check to make sure that you are able to:
This is the last unit of your course, you may want to check to make sure that you are able to:
Hello @MaraChequer good morning. No worries at all. I've added the missing check your learning to all units now. Here is the link to the course book: https://ma-lead.github.io/ldrs672/
Good afternoon @chloecwh , I would like to request some changes/fixes for the LDRS 672 bookdown file.
Where name is please insert the following: Course Developed by Imbenzi George
Below Welcome insert the following description (please compare with https://learn.twu.ca/course/view.php?id=28301§ion=2#tabs-tree-start) and include what has been updated from the welcome section:
This is the course book for LDRS 672: Global Relationship Development, Negotiation and Diplomacy. An examination of negotiation and international diplomacy and the impact of each on global relationships. Inquiry will focus on differences between North America, Europe, South Asia and the Middle East. Theories and practices will be considered from the perspective of a human rights ethic.
This book is divided into thematic units of study to help you engage with the materials. The course resources and learning activities are designed not only to help prepare you for the course assessments, but also to give you opportunities to practice various skills.
Below you will find information about how to navigate this book. Please read the full course syllabus located on the Course Home page in Moodle. It includes key information about the course schedule, assignments, and policies.
Done @MaraChequer https://ma-lead.github.io/ldrs672/
LDRS 672
SME-Imbenzi George
URL
Instructions
The content will require editing for Learning Activities section on each unit. It can be left empty.