Closed StevenSmith2000 closed 5 months ago
@StevenSmith2000 No we haven't. We followed previous approaches and for a fair comparison used 81 instead. They mainly say in the paper that's because the original video lengths are not as long as Human3.6M.
Many thanks for the great work!
I wonder why the input frame length is chosen as 81 instead of 243 for MPI-INF-3DHP dataset. Have you tried training on 243 frames and how is the performance? Thank you!