Open philipbelesky opened 7 years ago
Summary of some research:
If we want to diversify from Heroku it looks like we are going to have to give up on at least one: deployment ease; persistence; and free pricing.
Had a chat with @theonlyjohnny (who may elaborate if he wishes) who operates the @zeet-co platform about his platform as an alternative. They are currently investigating the deployment using Docker Compose. Awaiting that, their model is with a flat monthly fee for sites, but resources would not be an issue for the users. An idea that was brought up was that Tabbycat could use their API to deploy sites in the place of users (and so payment would fall to Tabbycat), and through that add credentials for email. The little hitch would be in data retention as the database would have a monthly fee, unlike through Heroku.
That sounds great, and having more SASS-style platforms would be great. For the purposes of resolving this issue, the original intent for this issue was to find a similarly decentralised platform to Heroku which I think would always be desirable as an option; particularly if Heroku no longer was.
Now that the Google Cloud Platform has a PostgreSQL option it might be worth whether it's a viable option to supplement heroku. From what I recall App Engine has good Django support and there is a generous free trial / free quota.
EDIT/update: this is now a general tracking issue for non-Heroku based deployment options.