Closed philipbelesky closed 9 years ago
Ah, test_score
is currently a required field of Adjudicator
. Do we want to make this optional?
Also, removed from the Australs milestone - we don't need it for Australs, since it has an adj test, right?
Yea, would be good to have it as optional, if just for smaller tournaments. There might also be a use case where it is used as a to pre-indicate good judges and left as blank for unknown judges.
I assume Australs will have a judge test this year. Although also remember that occasionally judges are brought in midway through a tournament that haven't done the test.
True, is it important enough to include in the milestone? I sort of feel like the correct thing to happen is for the adj core to assign a test score when they get added.
True. And no, doesn't seem important to include for Australis.
Probably not useful for tournaments with adj tests, but it would be nice to differentiate between very bad and unranked judges. It also slightly ambiguous in that adj's can in theory have their score set to 0 (even though the range is normally 1-5 or 1-10.