search

TabletopAssistant / DiceKit

Swift framework for expressing and evaluating dice notation (e.g., d20, 4d6+4, 3d8×10+2), which is commonly used in tabletop role-playing games.
Apache License 2.0
14 stars 1 forks source link

Add LICENSE #17

Closed brentleyjones closed 9 years ago

brentleyjones commented 9 years ago

Sort of important...

brentleyjones commented 9 years ago

I'm thinking Apache 2.0 (https://tldrlegal.com/license/apache-license-2.0-(apache-2.0)) or MIT (https://tldrlegal.com/license/mit-license).

@TabletopAssistant/dicekit?

brentleyjones commented 9 years ago

In particular, I think that section 5 of Apache 2.0 means we don't need a CLA:

  1. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of this License, without any additional terms or conditions. Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

Well, not needed if we don't plan on making it commercially available as well... I think.

My vote is for Apache 2.0, if no one is against it.

LoganJohnson commented 9 years ago

In my quick look at it I didn't see anything that swayed me hard in either direction. Apache seems a little more formal but not in a bad way. I'm good with Apache 2.0.

JonathanHoffman commented 9 years ago

I always liked the straightforwardness of MIT. But I don't think I have a strong enough opinion to push either way, so if you think Apache 2.0 is best then I would go with that.