1 - I encountered issues with viewing transaction history on various chains: Subsocial, Joystream, InvArch Tinkernet and Bajun. The Module and Time consistently appear to be correct. However, the Amount and ID are consistently missing, and Fee information is often absent. While I understand that the absence of amount information is reasonable in many cases, I still believe that the ID and Fees should be generally displayed.
Here are some specific notes, using Subsocial as a case study:
I noticed that only transactions of the Post module (calls to create_post and update_post) provide information about transaction fees (Screenshot 1A in "To Reproduce").
Interestingly, only one of the transactions identified with the Sudo module had the amount properly identified (Screenshot 1B in 'To Reproduce'). I believe these transactions represent the vesting that was set up with the Sudo. Should these be counted as transfers? It seems that on Calamar, all we can observe are extrinsics called by each account.
Note that none of these ones are supported in Subscan and therefore rely on inferior block explorers or have none at all (i.e., Subscan only has Calamar, etc).
1A - Only transactions of the Post module (calls to create_post and update_post) provide information about transaction fees.
1B - Only one of the transactions identified with the Sudo module had the amount properly identified.
Not all transactions will incur a fee, also sudo (Super user do) transaction is a parent transaction that can contain any child transaction, some of which will have a token amount involved
From Kanbeok
1 - I encountered issues with viewing transaction history on various chains: Subsocial, Joystream, InvArch Tinkernet and Bajun. The Module and Time consistently appear to be correct. However, the Amount and ID are consistently missing, and Fee information is often absent. While I understand that the absence of amount information is reasonable in many cases, I still believe that the ID and Fees should be generally displayed.
Here are some specific notes, using Subsocial as a case study: I noticed that only transactions of the Post module (calls to create_post and update_post) provide information about transaction fees (Screenshot 1A in "To Reproduce"). Interestingly, only one of the transactions identified with the Sudo module had the amount properly identified (Screenshot 1B in 'To Reproduce'). I believe these transactions represent the vesting that was set up with the Sudo. Should these be counted as transfers? It seems that on Calamar, all we can observe are extrinsics called by each account.
Note that none of these ones are supported in Subscan and therefore rely on inferior block explorers or have none at all (i.e., Subscan only has Calamar, etc).
1A - Only transactions of the Post module (calls to create_post and update_post) provide information about transaction fees.
1B - Only one of the transactions identified with the Sudo module had the amount properly identified.