search

TamaraK / coming-soon-page

Create a business card website to act as the coming soon page for your portfolio.
0 stars 0 forks source link

Portfolio Peer Review #2

Open krystyna-Macleod opened 5 years ago

krystyna-Macleod commented 5 years ago
0 points 1 points 2 points 3 points
Pages & images Barely started Missing lots of pages & images Has most of the pages, some placeholder images All pages exist and are well done with complete imagery
Personality & design Bland, boring, just another graphic designer Fairly generic, visual design could be pushed more Quality layouts and unique, personable content & design Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content & design
Image quality Only placeholder images Some portfolio piece images Lots of images but low quality High quality portfolio images — and lots of them
Accessibility No considerations Added some alt attributes, nothing else Just the basics: alt attributes, roles Accessibility is well considered and tested
Text content Fake content only Some real content, some fake All real content but with lots of errors Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors
Responsiveness Not responsive Works on some screens Responsive but with lots of awkwardness Looks great on all screen sizes
Code quality Barely started Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics Well indented, fully valid, good semantics

Pages & Images: 2 — I really like her home page layout. The motion page could be done better and if the vides could be on the same line. Personality & design: 3 — you can really see her personality through the website and what she likes and does. Image quality: 3 — The images quailty is really good but only find them to be a little big for view them. Accessibility: 3 — Accesibility is good. Text content: 2 — She explains what it is but can go a bit more in depth about it. Responsiveness: 2 — The motion page doesn't work well on the smaller view. Code quality: 2 — The code is good and she just need to tweak somethings to make it stand out more.

Total: 17/21

catherine9 commented 5 years ago

Pages & images 2 points- Motion page needs a bit of fixture to avoid confusion, and fix one of the footers Personality & design 3 points- I like how simple it is, very straight to the point Image quality 3 points- Quality of the image is neatly done, high quality Accessibility 3 points- very accessible for the user Text content 3 points -Content is well written no spelling errors Responsiveness 2 points- The motion page, videos are probably an easy fix. The text needs a bit of work to make it more responsive Code quality 2.5 points- Code is good, just fix bits of code to make it better