Tarobish / Jomhuria

http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/
SIL Open Font License 1.1
22 stars 6 forks source link

space #10

Closed Tarobish closed 9 years ago

Tarobish commented 9 years ago

I believe space it has to be tighter

graphicore commented 9 years ago

@EbenSorkin wrote:

Still, I’ll need the space so I added it and made it match the 600 units you have. This seems wide for the latin in a display font for sure. Would you guys look and see if this needs to be this wide for the Arabic? To my eye it looks a bit wide there too.

So you all agree. What's the number then?

graphicore commented 9 years ago

@Tarobish @EbenSorkin space is now 450. Please check if that's good.

EbenSorkin commented 9 years ago

I checked and 400 seems like better than 450 but the Arabic should be the deciding factor.

Kourosh?

Sample image

-e.

On Jun 19, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:

@Tarobish @EbenSorkin space is now 450. Please check if that's good.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

EbenSorkin commented 9 years ago

I checked too I do agree with Eben, it could be 400

On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Eben Sorkin sorkineben@gmail.com wrote:

I checked and 400 seems like better than 450 but the Arabic should be the deciding factor.

Kourosh?

Sample image

-e. On Jun 19, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Lasse Fister > wrote: > @Tarobish https://github.com/Tarobish @EbenSorkin https://github.com/EbenSorkin space is now 450. Please check if that's good. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/10#issuecomment-113615187.
graphicore commented 9 years ago

@Tarobish @EbenSorkin space is now 400. Please check.

Tarobish commented 9 years ago

I’m happy :) Many Thanks

On Jun 22, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:

@Tarobish https://github.com/Tarobish @EbenSorkin https://github.com/EbenSorkin space is now 400. Please check.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/10#issuecomment-114327472.