Closed Tarobish closed 9 years ago
@graphicore it would be helpful in the testing documents to have a comparison with amiri - and other arabic fonts that are well regarded, like Adobe Arabic that ships with CS, and is available as a web font from https://typekit.com/fonts/adobe-arabic . @Tarobish do you have an adobe CC subscription that you could use for this purpose?
Great idea, i do @graphicore https://github.com/graphicore
On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Dave Crossland notifications@github.com wrote:
@graphicore https://github.com/graphicore it would be helpful in the testing documents to have a comparison with amiri - and other arabic fonts that are well regarded, like Adobe Arabic that ships with CS, and is available as a web font from https://typekit.com/fonts/adobe-arabic https://typekit.com/fonts/adobe-arabic . @Tarobish https://github.com/Tarobish do you have an adobe CC subscription that you could use for this purpose?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/11#issuecomment-111646093.
I can add this. What is the preferred mode? Two tables next to each other)? Change the font when hovering a cell or row? Press a key on the keyboard to change to the comparison font (could move the content around bit)? It should be something simple, so that I don't spend too much time with UI development. Right now my approach is very minimalistic.
I'd add a dropdown to select the active comparison font from a list of choices, so we can use Amiri, Adobe Arabic and more.
I can think of 4 comparison modes:
Side by side in cols, for checking vertical aspects
Side by side in rows for checking horizontal aspects
Overlaid with opacity and color for checking all similarities
Copositioned toggling/rotating on keypresses, on a timer, on mouseover, for checking all differences
Copositioned masking, with a slider, for checking differences
TestMyFont.com has code you can look at for the timed toggle but it's simple css
@davelab6 I changed the table generating code to a common base. The table can already duplicate the data rows or the data columns. This will get an interface soon.
@Tarobish check this out (just uni0*\ combinations): http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-1 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-2
I will treat the uniF** glyphs extra. And I won't treat the u1EE* glyphs.
Awesome, look perfect :)
Many thanks
On Jun 19, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:
@Tarobish https://github.com/Tarobish check this out (just uni0* combinations): http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-1 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-1 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-2 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-2 I will treat the uniF* glyphs extra. And I won't treat the u1EE\ glyphs.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/11#issuecomment-113616570.
@davelab6 There is some comparison now, in all tables:
screenshot from http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-1
This is the test for the uniFxxx
cases which I fixed
http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/collision-above-1b
here is the glyph's name, which has colliding above the baseline like تا ثا تآ ثآ ثلا تلا ثلآ ثاٍ تاِ probably we can use "aAlf.fina.alt" as a replacement for the whole colliding with "Alef" with and without marks except "uni0622.fina" uniFE82 (letter Alef with Maddah above)
uni0753.init uni0751.init uni067D.init uni067F.init uni067C.init uni062B.init uni062A.init uniFB64 uniFE97 uniFE9B u1EE35 u1EE36
In Connection With
aAlf.fina uni0625.fina uni0627.fina uni0774.fina uni0773.fina uni0623.fina uni0622.fina uni0675.fina uni0672.fina uni0673.fina uni0671.fina uniFB51 uniFE82 uniFE84 uniFE88 uniFE8E u1EE6F aLam.medi_LamAlfFina aAlf.fina uni076A.medi_LamAlfFina uni06B6.medi_LamAlfFina uni06B8.medi_LamAlfFina uni0644.medi_LamAlfFina uni06B7.medi_LamAlfFina uni06B5.medi_LamAlfFina uniFEFC uniFEFA uniFEF8 uniFEF6