Tarobish / Jomhuria

http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/
SIL Open Font License 1.1
23 stars 6 forks source link

Arabic/Latin mark/punctuation shapes #17

Closed davelab6 closed 9 years ago

davelab6 commented 9 years ago

@Tarobish the Latin punctuation and the Arabic dots (nukta?) look very different, being very round or very square:

screen shot 2015-06-12 at 5 54 12 pm

Should one be changed to harmonize or is this a strong design intent?

cc @EbenSorkin

Tarobish commented 9 years ago

For the Persian/Arabic the Latin punctuation could be like the one we have (it works better, more harmony with the rest of the characters) but if you think we have to change it, i’ll design something else what do you think? cc @EbenSorkin https://github.com/EbenSorkin

On Jun 12, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Dave Crossland notifications@github.com wrote:

Should one be changed to harmonize or is this a strong design intent?

graphicore commented 9 years ago

We can replace them according to the text-language, if that helps.

EbenSorkin commented 9 years ago

Latin punctuation shapes in this case is highly flexible. We can definitely adapt. :-)

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:33 PM -0700, "Tarobish" notifications@github.com wrote:

For the Persian/Arabic the Latin punctuation could be like the one we have (it works better, more harmony with the rest of the characters) but if you think we have to change it, i’ll design something else

what do you think? cc @EbenSorkin https://github.com/EbenSorkin

On Jun 12, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Dave Crossland notifications@github.com wrote:

Should one be changed to harmonize or is this a strong design intent?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Tarobish commented 9 years ago

On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Eben Sorkin notifications@github.com wrote:

Latin punctuation shapes in this case is highly flexible. We can definitely adapt. :-) Great :)

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:33 PM -0700, "Tarobish" notifications@github.com wrote:

For the Persian/Arabic the Latin punctuation could be like the one we have (it works better, more harmony with the rest of the characters) but if you think we have to change it, i’ll design something else

what do you think? cc @EbenSorkin https://github.com/EbenSorkin

On Jun 12, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Dave Crossland notifications@github.com wrote:

Should one be changed to harmonize or is this a strong design intent?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/17#issuecomment-111646777.

khaledhosny commented 9 years ago

Language/Script-specific glyphs for common punctuation is an option, but note that the selection often fails due to combinations of lack of proper text tagging, bad itemization due to incorrect bidi intervention or both.

graphicore commented 9 years ago

What about this, can it be closed?

EbenSorkin commented 9 years ago

I was under the impression that Kourosh was Ok with the punctuation now.

-e.

On Jul 8, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Khaled Hosny notifications@github.com wrote:

Language/Script-specific glyphs for common punctuation is an option, but note that the selection often fails due to combinations of lack of proper text tagging, bad itemization due to incorrect bidi intervention or both.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.