Closed graphicore closed 9 years ago
in naskh and Titr style of arabic/persian this is true: demo1 : http://share.pho.to/9SG7m/cr/original demo 2: http://share.pho.to/9SG8y/ty/original
@zoghal what are those 2 fonts? :)
@davelab6 These two new Persian fonts. Diba and Ordibehesht.
That you designed? :)
No, I'm not a designer, I am a developer. I'm working on a startup or project research that will help Iranian designers to design standard fonts for farsi.
Ok :) Where are these fonts from? On 12 Jun 2015 10:19 pm, "Saleh Souzanchi" notifications@github.com wrote:
No, I'm not a designer, I am a developer. I'm working on a startup or project research that will help Iranian designers to design standard fonts for farsi.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/7#issuecomment-111655419.
I know the designer Diba it has been design by damoon khanjanzadeh And ordibehesht it is an old Persian typeset has been developed recently
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 12, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Dave Crossland notifications@github.com wrote:
Ok :) Where are these fonts from? On 12 Jun 2015 10:19 pm, "Saleh Souzanchi" notifications@github.com wrote:
No, I'm not a designer, I am a developer. I'm working on a startup or project research that will help Iranian designers to design standard fonts for farsi.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/7#issuecomment-111655419.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Diba : designer : Damon khan janzade
Ordibehesht : orginal designer :unknown designer (main source is letraset) this front has The two designers claim fonts and each chose a different name. ordibehest and todeh :d fallow this link
i am supporting and help to ordibehesht for publishing with ofl license (https://github.com/font-store/Font-Ordibehesht)
@Tarobish I think the first one (on the right side, with aKaf.medi_KafLam plus the LamAlfFina) is broken because the left side bearing is to far on the left side. See the image below.
The glyph should rather start where the base-line connects. Or you do it with kerning, but either way, I think that's your task.
I'm checking the other combination now.
No, it has to be like this. the point is, it will be connected with the right side of the next character. please see below. or you think it has to be done by kerning? please let me know
Please stay at the first example. I think we have a different issue with the second one.
Yes I think it has to be done with kerning. But not with the kern feature, but with the glyph being shorter itself.
Like this:
On the other hand. You show ligatures uniFCEB
uniFC80
etc. Do you think Amiri used these? The feature must have gone lost in Toronto then.
The original character, with the sidebearing you gave it, how is it supposed to connect anyways? I can't imagine that there is a single working combination this way.
yes, This is from Amiri, i believe we kept this feature. otherwise we lost in Toronto.
It's simple. the red lines are R&L bearing from the "Kaf" and the blue one belong to the next character "lam" easily they will be connected. please let me know if I'm wrong :)
If these shapes meet each other in text, the red and blue lines in the middle would be aligned. Therefore the gap happens.
In Amiri, the baseline ends with the left side-bearing:
This is what we are doing here:
The solid block under the glyph shapes, that's the side bearings. Think about your red/blue line example in these terms.
I think, the baseline ends with the left side-bearing because of the Khaled's design. if we do that our ligature its going to be like this :( I'm right? or I'm confused :(
The thing is that we don't actually show the ligature in the text. The ligature is in this legacy unicode code block, that is not really used anymore. What we do instead is showing uni0643.med_KafLam
and then uni0644.medi_KafĹam
. But for that, the glyph uni0643.med_KafLam
is broken.
Now, when you repair the glyph, your Ligature breaks, because the positioning is done relative to the left side of the glyph (which is zero in the coordinate system).
I just fixed the other issue with the other combination. Now we have the same problem there:
I updated the pdfs and gh-pages, you can observe there.
Now I got :) I'll fix it :) I have to redesign these characters Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 22, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:
I just fixed the other issue with the other combination. Now we have the same problem there:
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
If you want the kaf to touch the lam, then you should decrease the left side bearing, otherwise you can always have a contextual form for the kaf when followed by lam.
Thanks, got it. i have to redesign the “Kaf"
On Jun 23, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Khaled Hosny notifications@github.com wrote:
If you want the kaf to touch the lam, then you should decrease the left side bearing, otherwise you can always have a contextual form for the kaf when followed by lam.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/7#issuecomment-114565023.
@Tarobish Why don't do just as I did here and then repair the ligature glyphs. What do you plan to redesign?
thats what i want to do (the way you did it) but i have to work on the top side of the “Kaf” this way its going to be a bit short.
On Jun 23, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:
@Tarobish https://github.com/Tarobish Why don't do just as I did here https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/7#issuecomment-114232972 and then repair the ligature glyphs. What do you plan to redesign?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/7#issuecomment-114567193.
OK
I just committed, please check it and let me know
Looking good :-) check the pdfs and this stuff:
http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/kaf-lam-alf-1 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/kaf-lam-alf-2
Perfect :)
On Jun 23, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:
Looking good :-) check the pdfs and this stuff:
http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/kaf-lam-alf-1 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/kaf-lam-alf-1 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/kaf-lam-alf-2 http://tarobish.github.io/Jomhuria/#tests/kaf-lam-alf-2 — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Jomhuria/issues/7#issuecomment-114645039.
@Tarobish