Especial character 03

[Tarobish]

This Character its has to be a difficult for all the scripts This Character works the way which (uni06BD.medi_High, uni0775.medi_High, etc ...) functions in Jomhuria

[graphicore]

Not enough information/guidance for me to even ask a useful question :-/

1. I don't know how uni06BD.medi_High, uni0775.medi_High behave in Jomhuria
2. I don't know what "etc" is
3. I don't know what to do.

[Tarobish]

[Tarobish]

Sorry, my bad i didn’t mention it is "dotlessbeh_High-ar” when two or more characters from "dotlessbeh-ar.medi” family are neighbors the second one it must change to "dotlessbeh_High-ar” this way we don’t have same tooth high just repeat after each other (its docent look good) here is the sample of "Adobe Arabic" compare to “Jumhuria"

[graphicore]

Ok, the feature is there, but it reveals some work for you:

dotlessbeh_High-ar misses the top/bottom anchor as it seems. E.g.:

At least the top anchor is missing. The bottom one probably as well, but maybe it is just placed badly.

Whenever there is no proper variation the mark-glyphs are not of type mark. You must set the right type for these

An example image cut out from below:

Some examples as text: circumflex.below Is not a mark! You must change its type. (used for sub uni0755 by uni066E.medi circumflex.below;) vbelowar seems to be broken (not a mark) as well (used for sub uni08A0 by uni066E.medi vbelowar;)

* Please fix these wrong types and make the "marks" *

Live Tesing

[graphicore]

Ok, I updated the original long post with a new test page link and screenshot.

[graphicore]

Oh, interesting observation:

In the Jomhuria example the variation is: big -> small -> big ->small -> big ->small But I did for Katibeh: small -> big ->small -> big ->small -> big

Which style do you want?

[Tarobish]

Would you please shoe me the samples then i can decided :)

On Feb 5, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:

Oh, interesting observation:

In the Jomhuria example the variation is: big -> small -> big ->small -> big ->small But I did for Katibeh: small -> big ->small -> big ->small -> big

Which style do you want?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Katibeh/issues/72#issuecomment-180453805.

[graphicore]

Are you kidding? There is a 11000 pixel high image 3 comments above!

[Tarobish]

Oh I’m checking email i didn’t come with the picture let me check repo :)

On Feb 5, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:

Are you kidding? There is a 11000 pixel high image 3 comments above!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Tarobish/Katibeh/issues/72#issuecomment-180469796.

[Tarobish]

Looks Awesome lets go with yours :) : small -> big ->small -> big ->small -> big

[graphicore]

:+1:

Looks Awesome

We don't make mistakes; we have happy accidents!

[graphicore]

Ah, much better now!

Two things though:

• The line case of uni0755 => uni066E.medi circumflex.below is still broken. Please double check that circumflex.below is indeed a mark.
  • uni067C => uni066E.medi The line looks bad, I'll open another issue for this, because we have a lot of cases with a ring (or something else) merged into the base form (instead of having it as a mark plus custom anchor)

[graphicore]

The line of uni067C looks now like this:

To make it behave like the rest I suggest the same as in: Tarobish/Mirza#98 or we leave it as it is.

[Tarobish]

Ok :) Great!