search

Tarobish / Katibeh

Katibeh Arabic Font Project
http://tarobish.github.io/Katibeh/
SIL Open Font License 1.1
13 stars 4 forks source link

TahSmallTwoDotsabovear is not of type mark #90

Closed graphicore closed 8 years ago

graphicore commented 8 years ago

It is apparently in Mirza already a mark.

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

Please let me know screen shot 2016-02-05 at 10 26 35 am

graphicore commented 8 years ago

TahSmallTwoDotsabovear you show me below

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

Oh Sorry

screen shot 2016-02-05 at 10 31 56 am

graphicore commented 8 years ago

You just changed that or is it like that all the time?

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

I didn't, it was like that

graphicore commented 8 years ago

Hmm, IC. Does it have the _top anchor?

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

It does

screen shot 2016-02-05 at 10 37 37 am

graphicore commented 8 years ago

Shouldn't one of these anchors be displayed as a square?

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

They are all same

screen shot 2016-02-05 at 10 40 41 am

graphicore commented 8 years ago

Show me just the single dot mark. I rareley see this kind of v + dot. But the single dot is all over the place and working fine.

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

screen shot 2016-02-05 at 10 49 52 am

graphicore commented 8 years ago

Ok, I don't know what is wrong here, but I can tell you that it is good in Mirza and bad in Katibeh. In the images, compare the rightmost column.

Katibeh:

selection_035

http://tarobish.github.io/Katibeh/html/generated-pages.html#tests/Issue%20%2317%3A%20ligature%2017%20%28uniFD2A%29

Mirza:

selection_036

http://tarobish.github.io/Mirza/html/generated-pages.html#tests/Issue%20%2317%3A%20ligature%2017%20%28uniFD2A%29

graphicore commented 8 years ago

It must be something in Glyphs, because with Mirza we have prove that the mark-type is exported just fine with the glyph.

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

I'll compere it with mirza

KB STUDIO

On Feb 5, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok, I don't know what is wrong here, but I can tell you that it is good in Mirza and bad in Katibeh. In the images, compare the rightmost column.

Katibeh:

http://tarobish.github.io/Katibeh/html/generated-pages.html#tests/Issue%20%2317%3A%20ligature%2017%20%28uniFD2A%29

Mirza:

http://tarobish.github.io/Mirza/html/generated-pages.html#tests/Issue%20%2317%3A%20ligature%2017%20%28uniFD2A%29

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

Exactly!

KB STUDIO

On Feb 5, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:

It must be something in Glyphs, because with Mirza we have prove that the mark-type is exported just fine with the glyph.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

graphicore commented 8 years ago

Ah, it's fixed now. Obviously you changed it in the meantime. Maybe when fixing #72

Tarobish commented 8 years ago

Great :)

KB STUDIO

On Feb 5, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Lasse Fister notifications@github.com wrote:

Ah, it's fixed now. Obviously you changed it in the meantime. Maybe when fixing #72

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.