I'm currently in the process of decomposing glyphs into base form + marks.
Unfortunately some marks are missing.
For example:
before we did to create the final form of uni076E:
sub uni076E by uni076E.fina;
however, because we don't want to create so many different ligatures, it's important that we can decompose this, e.g.:
subuni076E by uniFEA2 uniFBC1;
Where:
076E: ARABIC LETTER HAH WITH SMALL ARABIC LETTER TAH BELOW
FEA2: ARABIC LETTER HAH FINAL FORM
FBC1: ARABIC SYMBOL SMALL TAH BELOW
However uniFBC1 is missinguni076E.fina is instead constructed with uni0615
I think I don't need a unicode encoded tah below (uniFBC1), a letter tah.below would be sufficient. This is up to you.The problem with the uni0615 mark is that it goes to the anchor above. I need a version that goes to the anchor below.
I'm currently in the process of decomposing glyphs into base form + marks.
Unfortunately some marks are missing.
For example:
before we did to create the final form of
uni076E
:sub uni076E by uni076E.fina;
however, because we don't want to create so many different ligatures, it's important that we can decompose this, e.g.:
subuni076E by uniFEA2 uniFBC1
;Where:
076E: ARABIC LETTER HAH WITH SMALL ARABIC LETTER TAH BELOW FEA2: ARABIC LETTER HAH FINAL FORM FBC1: ARABIC SYMBOL SMALL TAH BELOW
However uniFBC1 is missing
uni076E.fina
is instead constructed withuni0615
I think I don't need a unicode encoded tah below (uniFBC1), a letter
tah.below
would be sufficient. This is up to you.The problem with theuni0615
mark is that it goes to the anchor above. I need a version that goes to the anchor below.