Taryck / zaplink

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/zaplink
0 stars 1 forks source link

zaplink_subcomponent_level missing when trying to activate installation program #134

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
#WARNING : All issues must have the framework information file build using
transaction ZL_INFOS or if not working program ZAPLINK_INFOS_STANDALONE
(that could be downloaded). Each issue without these file might be close
without any investigation. Before opening an Issue please try with the last
framework version.

#What version of the product are you using? ==> add a release label
"Dectected-on ...".

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.

What is the expected output?

What do you see instead?

#Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dominik....@gmail.com on 28 Feb 2012 at 3:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
same thing here....

Original comment by rene.sli...@cebiq.com on 20 Mar 2012 at 7:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Please provide informations needed to reproduce the issue :
- ZL version
- Steps done

Because we don't even known what you've talking about... 
- do you have an exception ? which one ...

Original comment by tar...@bensiali.net on 27 Mar 2012 at 8:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
If you try to search for the definition of zaplink_subcomponent_level in the 
standalone installation program of ZAPLINK_EXTRACTOR, you'll not find it. I 
think the problem is that you're not pulling it out when you're generating the 
program.

I've tried all I think 3 or 4 versions back and also the newest one. All had 
the same problem. 

To reproduce:
- you'd need to have a clean system so that zaplink_subcomponent_level is not 
defined in the dictionary
- try to CHECK (CTRL+F2) the extractor program

Alternatively
- delete zaplink_subcomponent_level from the dictionary
- CHECK extractor program
- add zaplink_subcomponent_level back to the dictionary after you fix the 
problem in the extractor

OR:
- just do a search over the extractor for zaplink_subcomponent_level - like 
mentioned earlier - you'll not find it

Original comment by dominik....@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2012 at 9:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I think you talking about : ZAPLINK_EXTRACTOR_STANDALONE ?
To fix your issue without waiting for next release just add at the first line 
after report :
Types ZAPLINK_SUBCOMPONENT_LEVEL TYPE C.

You might also need to look for exception "ZAPLINK_CX_IMPORT_NOT_ALLOWED" and 
rename as "ZAPLINK_CX"

This will be fixed in next release, but need to change the standalone generator.

Original comment by tar...@bensiali.net on 27 Mar 2012 at 3:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
When generating standalone version all inherited exception class are added...
Next fix is to identify missing usage...

Original comment by tar...@bensiali.net on 5 Apr 2012 at 3:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hi,

This has been fixed within last release 0.0.009a see issue 137.

Taryck.

Original comment by Taryck.B...@gmail.com on 29 Nov 2012 at 5:34