TeamAOF / All-of-Fabric-3

Modpack containing the latest & best Fabric mods
Other
73 stars 18 forks source link

[BUG] Inferium armor protection not working if all armor slots are being used #426

Open carlosrene66 opened 3 years ago

carlosrene66 commented 3 years ago

Is this a modpack or mod issue? Modpack (Ive tested the mod outside of the modpack and the bug is not present)

PLEASE MENTION IF YOU ADDED ANY MODS.. ESPECIALLY SODIUM, IF YOU DON'T, IT MAKES US VERY GRUMPY I have ONLY added sodium and indium, when i tested the bug outside of the modpack i also had sodium and indium

Modpack Version 2.8.5 (Release)

Describe the bug For some reason, inferium armor is better than diamond until you have the full set of armor; I've tested it with and without artifacts, hats and everything but the bug still occurs. Compare a full set of inferium armor with a full set of diamond armor, you can get 2 shot killed by an enderman with inferium armor! When i first experienced the bug i just crafted my first set of inferium armor and i went to the nether to get some soul dust and i almost got killed in just 3 hits by a normal sword piglin!, that's when i knew something was wrong

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Get a full set of inferium armor
  2. Find and get hurt by any mob
  3. Get almost the same amount of damage to not having armor at all!

Expected behavior Inferium armor should be better than diamond armor, and it is until you have all pieces of inferium armor

Additional context The bug seems to occur when all armor slots are occupied, so i tried wearing full inferium armor with diamond boots, for some reason the diamond boots defence dont get affected but inferium armor does. Also the armor points bar seems unaffected by this bug so it'll appear full even tho you are taking full damage

Kuodos commented 3 years ago

Caused by Attribute Fix

Kuodos commented 3 years ago

Downgrading to attribute-fix-fabric-1.0.0 fixes the issue

Mendanbar commented 2 years ago

https://github.com/TeamAOF/All-of-Fabric-3/issues/418#issuecomment-968327177