Closed StevenClontz closed 3 years ago
(I guess we could still have a second part asking to find RREF of a matrix, but allow technology. Maybe that'd make a point.)
@siwelwerd thoughts on this? (Working thru Fri to get this core bank fixed up, then forking a version to align with Fall 2021 development edition)
Gaussian elimination is specifically listed in the course description here, and I assume many other places. So my inclination is to keep it.
Ah, right, that's reasonable. But I still like getting at each of the properties of RREF in each exercise. So would you be okay with this?
- For each of the below matrices, explain why it is not in RREF.
[three matrices breaking each of three requirements]
- Show how to compute RREF[MATRIX] = [its RREF].
I like it. Maybe on 2, "Show step by step how to compute..."
Would it make sense to have E2 give the student four matrices:
Then have students find the RREF, explain what's wrong with the other three, then fix them?
I think this eliminates needing experience with full Gauss-Jordan elimination. To which I'd want to consider if this is bad: students can still learn it optionally if they want to do these RREFs by hand, but I'm also okay with them using tech all semester I think.