Closed AstrophysicsAndPython closed 2 years ago
Hi @noonuu, yes this is a feature of the Fryer2012 Delayed supernova prescription for remnant mass (See Fryer et al. 2012, section 4.3). In their prescription, all stars with CO cores < 2.5 Msol at the time of supernova have a final gravitational mass of 1.27758 as you've found, so this value is expected to be repeated.
Consider using MULLERMANDEL instead of FRYER2012 for the remnant mass prescription -- this is a stochastic remnant mass model and will generally yield a more smooth distribution (though you may still find a peak corresponding to ECSN remnant masses).
For the configuration below
The random seeds
2135516081
,2135519043
,2135521747
,2135435955
, and several others produce the same mass secondary NS after the evolution which is1.2775835252086558 Msol
. A few of the progenitor star masses lie close to one another but at large separations, however, some large mass stars are also found to have the same end value for the secondary NS produced.Is this supposed to happen? 29/43 NS binaries (Evolution stopped tag) are at the same secondary NS mass of 1.2775835252086558 Msol.