Closed reinhold-willcox closed 2 years ago
Especially weird is that it moves off the TPAGB to become an ONeWD before undergoing SN.
Is that what's described in Hurley+2000, p15, second-last paragraph (last full paragraph) left column?
Double compact object (NS+COWD) merging in nan Myr
Where's the 'nan' coming from?
Follow up on this: it appears this may be the correct behavior (in the sense that it follows the Hurley prescriptions, not that it's necessarily correct physically). But I will look into the mass range of ECSNe for single stars from all metallicites and update when I have that.
Where's the 'nan' coming from?
This binary has been disrupted by the SN, but we don't record that correctly in detailed_evol_plotter. That's a separate issue, though, for which I created a new issue, #801 . @reinhold-willcox , can I close this issue, since the C++ code is behaving as intended?
Describe the bug The following grid and options produce a non-interacting binary at Z=1e-4 with a 6 Msun primary that experiences a stripped-envelope, electron capture supernova. Especially weird is that it moves off the TPAGB to become an ONeWD before undergoing SN.
Here is the detailed evolution plotting output text:
And the detailed plot:
Label the issue
urgency_low
- This issue is not urgentseverity_minor
- This is a minor bug with minimal impactTo Reproduce grid.txt:
--initial-mass-1 6.034999559745024 --initial-mass-2 1.0 -a 1000
COMPAS --grid grid.txt --detailed --random-seed 300 --metallicity 0.0001
Expected behavior Is this just an oddity of the very low metallicity regime? Other stars at this Z with similar masses did not experience this...
Versioning (please complete the following information):