Open JoshuaLeivers opened 4 months ago
Hi JoshuaLeivers,
Given that ulx ban $ID
only lets you ban users by ID if they're currently on the server, wouldn't it be far more annoying to grab their ID to put into that field instead of using the dropdown?
Hi JoshuaLeivers,
Given that
ulx ban $ID
only lets you ban users by ID if they're currently on the server, wouldn't it be far more annoying to grab their ID to put into that field instead of using the dropdown?
Possibly, but it just means that people have another option to use. For example, on a server I moderate on, I usually have the person's SteamID copied already for other things, or can very easily get it, and it's simply easier to use the SteamID I already have, rather than searching through the names again to target them.
Hello JoshuaLeivers, We've done some internal testing to verify what you were asking. While we do see some value in adding this, it would not be something we act on immediately. This will go onto our to-do list for a possible future feature addition. Thank you for the input.
Steps to reproduce
ulx ban
, but notulx banid
!xban
Expected behavior
The field is accessible, but only lets you ban people as if you ran it via
ulx ban $STEAM_BLAH
, rather thanulx banid STEAM_BLAH
- i.e. no offline bans, and with permission checking.Actual behavior
Field is inaccessible, as it only allows the use of
ulx banid
, and so is only enabled if the user has permission to use that.Version
ULib v2.71d (08/05/22) ULX v3.81d (03/24/24)
Notes
This is more a feature request than a bug, despite what this format suggests. It would be nice to allow people to use SteamIDs via xban, as you already can use SteamIDs via
ulx ban $ID
, it's just not exactly the same asulx banid
.