Closed patrickunterwegs closed 1 year ago
Google Maps integration works better than OSM, so I think it's unlikely that users would choose OSM when they have Google Maps installed anyway. I'm rejecting this idea for now
Oh. Does this mean you are dropping OSM support. I don't have googlemaps installed on one device (removed it as I dislike all the crud it adds - OSM or OSmaps are much cleaner) and it was not supplied on the other device (a Chinese manufactured tablet running a customised version of android 11 without play store)
OSM works ok-ish on jtx2.3.1 - its a bit of a pain entering location coords which could be improved if you parsed them to allow degree symbol and 'N or S' and 'W or E' to be converted to a sign - and also provided a single box rather than separate lat and long. There is code around to parse various formats including 'deg, min, sec' See discussion which I can't find now.
I wouldn't mind if click on map to select location wasn't supported if I could copy/paste a lat + long string in various forms.
And while we're about it how about including What3Words.
Hey @rogercreagh , nope, not dropping OSM, it's just about the maps-integration in the app. I'm just dropping the idea that users that take the app from Google Play can also switch to OSM through the settings. The map-preview within the app would still work in your case - as long as you still have Google Play Services installed (which you have automatically when you have the Google Play Store).
In 2.4.0 I have added the option that you can pin coordinates on a map (like on Google Play). It's a bit slow, but that was the best that I could do for now.
Maybe in your case it makes also sense to react on "geo:"-Intents? Meaning that you can share a location and jtx Board should take it and add it as a location for a new entry?
I have never heard of What3Words, I'll have a look at it!
I downloaded jtx with obtainium. I have google play services. I was happy seeing osm. I wouldn't have liked jtx that much initially if it wouldn't have used osm.
It's good to know that if I would switch to gplay version, I lose the osm feature.
The demand for osm may not be huge but it exists, even with a worse integration.
Google Maps integration works better than OSM, so I think it's unlikely that users would choose OSM when they have Google Maps installed anyway. I'm rejecting this idea for now