Closed martin-braun closed 2 years ago
We could possibly look into doing this as part of the next major.
@TehShrike I've got plenty of free time to get back into working on the next release. We should probably have another meeting and talk about were we were up to.
For now you can use https://deno.land/x/deepmergets
@RebeccaStevens Thanks a lot. So this is just temporary or final? Should I close this issue or keep it open? Is Deno support planned on this repo? Is this project even using the smart merge tech that you market on your repo?
Thanks in advance. :)
My plans at the moment are to basically make version 5 of library the same as the current deepmerge-ts
library. But @TehShrike is the owner of this library and so it's up to him whether or not that will happen. I know he's not fan of abandoning the current API and would like to keep version 5's as close to version 4's as possible. I guess my job is to convince him to make the change.
This library isn't using the smart merging strategy that deepmerge-ts
is using. In my benchmarking, this library is actually super slow compared to deepmerge-ts
and all of the other competing libraries.
Keep this issue open for now as this library doesn't have Deno support yet.
are there any plans to port deepmerge over to Deno? A consistent solution for both engines would be nice and should be possible without much additional maintaining, since Deno is just node on steroids.
I have not used deno. What changes would need to be made?
@TehShrike It would really require you to learn about it and use it in the first place. You can import your library via hotlinking and test it. Once it runs, you could publish your module on https://deno.land/x/.
That is definitely a thing I could do
Hi,
are there any plans to port deepmerge over to Deno? A consistent solution for both engines would be nice and should be possible without much additional maintaining, since Deno is just node on steroids.
Cheers.