Closed TobiTekath closed 3 years ago
Thanks @panxiaoguang for the link, but what I meant to point out is that it is counter intuitive to write out a table of the number of interactions which separate entries for A -> B and B -> A, but both having the same number because they both represent A <-> B.
I hope that made my point more clear. Thanks.
Hi,
I just noticed that when plotting the heatmap the number of interactions in the "count_network.tsv" ("--count-network-name") are not correct, as the (significant) interactions of A -> B and B -> A are summed together beforehand (if A and B are different cell types).
Or is there a specific reasoning for this behaviour?
The same goes for the actual plot, which explains the perfect symmetry of the plot.