Open Tekki opened 5 years ago
Is this something you still want feedback on..? Could you open up a PR if you have reached a point where you think it should be merged?
a) yes, b) yes I've seen that you started to use 'note' in the tests. I'll have to do some work to make the tests here look the same.
Could you send me a link like https://github.com/jhthorsen/mojo-mysql/compare/master...Tekki:json-dev so it can be easier for me to compare/read the changes you've done?
It's not a big deal if you use "note" or not in the tests. I'm not even sure if it's a good idea - though I don't see any harm in doing so.
(There seems to be a lot of files/diff that is not core for this issue)
This is a development branch that contains a lot of other stuff. My question was more about the concept. But I'll prepare a new branch and a PR.
I’m positive in general to changes where the user of a module needs to do less 👍
...but I have to see the change before making a final decision.
This is planned as the next step for SQL::Abstract::mysql. @jhthorsen what do you think of it? Take a look at the docs and the tests. There are some live tests too.