Closed machineminded closed 5 months ago
I found that you are using dpmsolver. Could you increase the number of steps and try again?
Maybe you can also choose to use the quality
option
Hello. I did more experimenting today, and it appears to be due to my simple prompt and lack of a negative prompt. Apply a prompt from the style seems to resolve it. I will post my findings in the morning. Thank you.
Cool! Thanks again for your efforts!
At this point I'm pretty sure it's just the prompting. I am working on integrating the Fooocus prompt system into the diffusers pipeline. I have combined it with inswapper_128 for some pretty great results ššš.
It's really cool!
It seems like the euler scheduler generates better images than DPM++. I even tried adding euler_at_final
but the generations with DPM++ still are noisy. Even with 60+ steps.
DPMSolverMultistepScheduler(algorithm_type="sde-dpmsolver++", euler_at_final=True)
DPMSolverMultistepScheduler(algorithm_type="sde-dpmsolver++", euler_at_final=True); DPM_hash($sove)=>solution;
@machineminded Nice works! Could you please elaborate a bit more on how you combining photomaker with inswapper_128 for these nice photos?
@machineminded Nice works! Could you please elaborate a bit more on how you combining photomaker with inswapper_128 for these nice photos?
@CHELSEA234 I am using my fork of Fooocus with Inswapper and Photomaker! Soon instantID will be integrated as well.
To elaborate, I use PhotoMaker to create a likeness "substrate" and then inswapper lays the face on top.
Hello, I am getting noisy generations and the likeness is not there. Here is my code:
Any idea what might be going on?