Open ioggstream opened 4 years ago
Hi,
Seems like to abide by the convention mentioned, I need to change the header names from x-ratelimit-remaining
to Ratelimit-remaining
and so on. If this is the case, I can do the change in the next release while also mentioning about the same in this project's README. Is this what you expect?
For now it would just be great to mention the draft in the README, so that I can:
Once we go RFC we can change the names :P
As an implementor, your feedback on the actual contents of the draft are very welcome!
I wish
The project to mention the ratelimit-headers draft: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers-03.html
Notes
It seems we're trying to standardize the behavior you have implemented :) Please take a look at https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers
If you confirm that, we can cite actix-ratelimit in the spec as an implementor. In that case just drop a comment here: