TerrainBento / umami

Calculate topographic metrics for assessing model-data fit
https://umami.readthedocs.io
MIT License
1 stars 2 forks source link

Fix bibliography #14

Closed kbarnhart closed 5 years ago

kbarnhart commented 5 years ago

@sgrieve pointed out in the Joss review that one of the in-text references was inconsistent with the others. Specifically

I noticed that one of the in text references is inconsistent with the others, with (B. M. Adams et al., 2019) including initials where other in text references only use surnames.

kbarnhart commented 5 years ago

@arfon, I think you may be the correct person to ask for help with this issue.

I have a bibliography entry that looks like:

@article{adams2019dakota,
    author = {Adams, B. M. and Eldred, S. and Geraci, G. and Hooper, R. W. and 
Jakeman, J. D. and Maupin, K. A. and Monschk, J. A. and Rushdi, A. A. and 
Stephens, J. A. and Swiler, L. P. and Wildey, T. M. and Bohnhoff, W. J. and 
Dalbey, K. R. and Ebeida, M. S. and Eddy, J. P. and Hough, P. D. and Khalil, M. 
and Hu, K. T. and Ridgway, E. M. and Vigil, D. M. and Winokur, J. G.},
    title = {{Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design 
Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity 
Analysis: Version 6.10 User{\textquoteright}s Manual}},
    journal = {{Sandia National Laboratories, Tech. Rep. SAND2014-4633}},
    year = {2019}
    }

I need it to make an in-text reference that looks like:

Adams et al., 2019

Instead I'm getting

B. M. Adams et al., 2019

Previously, when I used a 2017 version of this bib entry AND referenced another paper that has a J. N. Adams et al., 2017 reference, I ran into issues regarding the citation because of bib latex's rules regarding disambiguation. But I'm not citing that paper in this submission (though J. N. Adams is a second author on one of the papers).

I just looked at what I think whedon might be using to generate the paper Latex Template, and haven't found anything that has helped me figure out why this reference is formatting in this way.

Do you have any recommendations?

arfon commented 5 years ago

@kbarnhart - not sure what was going on here but the version of Pandoc Whedon was using was pretty old so I've updated it and that seems to have fixed things ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

kbarnhart commented 5 years ago

Thanks @arfon !