Closed Inventitech closed 5 years ago
@TimvdLippe would you be willing to review this once I am done?
I can do static reviews, but I can not run the code.
Ok, cool, thx. I'll ping you once done.
Done. @TimvdLippe, would appreciate your feedback on this one.
Pretty flabbergasted by the number of issues I came across while implementing this TBH (#320, #319, and additionally commits 8b29992, 11fda2b).
master
.I do not share your flabbergasted reaction, as all of these issues either occur in very rare cases or were already documented/clarified. Given the large amount of changes that went live, we had a release with a very low aftermath of bugs. I am quite pleased with that result personally.
I will review your code probably on monday, as I will be busy this weekend and not have a laptop available to me.
@Inventitech I can't find a PR for this issue. Did I miss it? Would like to have a place where I can post the review comments 😄
Hi Tim,
Yap, sorry, I didn't think of the possibility to get a review on this at first, so committed directly to master. I'll see if I can at least get a decent diff.
Will get back.
One comment to your first bullet point: The code does indeed work in Eclipse (as stated in #320), the link you posted points to the (correct) code in Eclipse. In the same PR, we can also see the erroneous lines of code in the code clone for IntelliJ.
I created #321 so you can review the changes. Thanks!
This issue consists of the following substeps: