Closed sjanel closed 7 months ago
Ok, but what's the benefit of doing this ? The tests aren't supposed to be included in other programs, so name clashes shouldn't be an issue.
Benefits are readability, and removal of all prefixes of symbols accessed in jwt (removal of jwt::
).
Benefits are readability, and removal of all prefixes of symbols accessed in jwt (removal of
jwt::
).
Why not just stick a using namespace
at the top?
This seems very stylized and adds a lot of diff, why are you looking at the symbols of the test code? You are never going to link against it.
I don't have a strong opinion on this subject. Putting a top using namespace is fine for me.
Thanks a ton for this suggestion, since we seem to be agreed this is not a "functional" improvement and we have split or indifferent opinions... I am going to side of the side of caution and mark this as closed.
I really appreciate you brining in new ideas, please keep them coming! 🚀
All is in the title. No other change in this PR.