Open Than-Duc-Huy opened 1 year ago
Storage function is not implemented in the current version
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Storage isn't persistent
Storage is not persistent and my pets are not saved.
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2223S1/pe-interim#781] [original labels: type.FeatureFlaw severity.High]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
The storage is not implemented. However, the user can still use the product despite of some inconvenience. The severity is not high that makes it almost unable to use.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: It should be in scope because the ip already have some form of storage. So it is expected to have some form of storage. You cannot say that it is not planned for v2.1 because v2.1 should at least be a self-contained, publishable product
Team chose [type.FeatureFlaw
]
Originally [type.FunctionalityBug
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.Medium
]
Originally [severity.High
]
Reason for disagreement: I believed that it should remain High because the lack of this feature makes the program unusable. The appointment will have to be manually keyed in every time. If the user is aware of this fact, they won't be using the program in the first place.
There is no way to save the state of the program, all the pet, employee, appointment have to be added back manually
Does not remember the state of the program
No storage file