Open Than-Duc-Huy opened 1 year ago
No details provided by team.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
UG, DG: Mismatch instructions (Tester cannot add Appointment)
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
Wrong appointment instruction
The sample workflow says that appointment add has to be provided with service description but the main content of appointment heading and command summary said service id
This leads to the inability of the tester in testing Appointment functionality
Sample workflow (use description)
DG (use description)
Content of Appointment (use ID)
Command Summary (use ID)
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2223S1/pe-interim#846] [original labels: type.DocumentationBug severity.High]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Indeed the description here is incorrect. But all of examples given in adding appointments are correct elsewhere. E.g., sample workflow.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [type.DocumentationBug
]
Originally [type.FunctionalityBug
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.Medium
]
Originally [severity.High
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Service ID and Pet ID are all valid but cannot add