codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
7e7aae2) 95.13% compared to head (1ccb0ff) 95.13%. Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.:exclamation: Current head 1ccb0ff differs from pull request most recent head 2ca89ad. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2ca89ad to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #169 +/- ## ======================================== Coverage 95.13% 95.13% ======================================== Files 16 16 Lines 2426 2426 Branches 316 316 ======================================== Hits 2308 2308 Misses 72 72 Partials 46 46 ``` | [Files Changed](https://app.codecov.io/gh/The-Academic-Observatory/oaebu-workflows/pull/169?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=The-Academic-Observatory) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [oaebu\_workflows/workflows/jstor\_telescope.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/The-Academic-Observatory/oaebu-workflows/pull/169?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=The-Academic-Observatory#diff-b2FlYnVfd29ya2Zsb3dzL3dvcmtmbG93cy9qc3Rvcl90ZWxlc2NvcGUucHk=) | `94.87% <100.00%> (ø)` | |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
JSTOR has slightly changed their formatting, but new reports can still be processed in the same manner. Just needed to change the nature of the check for old vs. new formatted reports.