Hi, thanks for you wonderful work and open source.
After i retrained the code , i got the bad test result on vid4 dataset. Its psnr is 18.64,while the counterpart on paper is 26.01.
I think may be the two reasons:
1) training set
Since the CVDL dataset is to be processed to get training set . So my approach may be different from yours, which leads to this problem. Can you provide a well-processed training set or code of getting training set from CVDL dataset?
2)
Is the published code different from what you trained before?
Hi, thanks for you wonderful work and open source.
After i retrained the code , i got the bad test result on vid4 dataset. Its psnr is 18.64,while the counterpart on paper is 26.01.
I think may be the two reasons:
1) training set Since the CVDL dataset is to be processed to get training set . So my approach may be different from yours, which leads to this problem. Can you provide a well-processed training set or code of getting training set from CVDL dataset?
2)
Is the published code different from what you trained before?
Best regard,