Closed tajayi closed 5 years ago
Hi @tajayi, the new version in master should fix this. Please note that the spread pin option is to allocate pins to neighbour sections if the current is full. For initial pin placement (when other cells are not placed), use --random NUMBER (0 = default to no random, 1 = fully random, 2 = evenly spaced, 3 = group in the middle of the edges). Please close the issue if you think this is done. Thanks
Thanks. I'll try to validate soon, but may not get to it for a few weeks (About to go on vacation).
Can you please elaborate on what a "slot", "section" and "edge" is? Can this be added to the readme along with the options for --random
.
Also, how does --force-spread
work with --random 2
? Seems like what I should be using in the scripts should be --random 2
(no --force-spread) if I want a simple random (evenly spaced) spreading of pins around the die?
Will update the README, thanks for the reminder.
But a quick description is:
An "Edge" is one of the core boundaries (south, north, east, west) A "Slot" is a position in the edge where a pin can be placed. A "Section" is a group of sequential slots.
--force-spread
has no effect when using any random placement. Will clarify in documentation and warnings in the code to avoid further confusion.
Issue is resolved in all the designs. Thanks
Priority: Low
Version: 4b98e40f12e1acbe95da6bc6a997ab8493c5e168
Details Several designs in the alpha-release flow often have large gaps when spreading pins around the die. See the image below as an example
The command to ioPlacer in the flow is here: https://github.com/The-OpenROAD-Project/alpha-release/blob/master/flow/Makefile#L187
Steps to reproduce:
./results/nangate45/dynamic_node_top_wrap/2_2_floorplan_io.def
to observe the gap described (and pictured above)