The-Sequence-Ontology / SO-Ontologies

Collect of SO Ontologies
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
96 stars 37 forks source link

Request "fingerprint contig", to go with FPCmap (SO:0001250) #328

Open srynobio opened 9 years ago

srynobio commented 9 years ago

An FPCmap (SO:0001250) is often composed of several fingerprinted contigs (FPC). Currently there is no term for FPC. More info: The individual contigs are composed of several BACs (SO:0000153). The FPC map is the result of analysis of restriction site (?!) markers (SO:0001645), namely RFLP fragment (SO:0000193) markers (?!)... Can you also add a term for 'restriction site' and 'restriction site marker'? Sorry for overloading one request. Cheers, Dan

srynobio commented 9 years ago

Response from @keilbeck

Hi Dan OK, restriction site is the place where the enzyme cuts. WOuld you be happy with that being a synonym for the existing term restriction enzyme cleavage junction? restriction site marker - this is the sequence that is recognized by the enzyme? This terms exists already: restriction_enzyme_recognition_site. Would you be happy with a synonym? FPC is a contig? definition: contig composed of cloned sequence ordered by RFLP fragments Let me know if any of this works for you and changes you want to make. --KAren

srynobio commented 9 years ago

Response from Dan Bolser

Hi Karen, Yup "restriction enzyme cleavage junction" == "restriction site". A "restriction site marker" is a bit more complex, so I'm tempted to drop that request for now. Technically, its an "RFLP marker", i.e. an "RFLP fragment" used as a marker. Now I think about it, FPC is a bit tricky... actually FPC was originally derived from "FingerPrinted Contigs" named by the software called package called 'FPC'. Here is how they describe the software: "FPC takes as input a set of clones and their restriction fragments (called Bands) and assembles the clones into contigs" See:

srynobio commented 9 years ago

Response from @keilbeck

OK, FPC seems like it probably falls into the category of fragment assembly. Does this seem right to you? --K