The-Sequence-Ontology / SO-Ontologies

Collect of SO Ontologies
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
92 stars 37 forks source link

NTR: range extender element #649

Closed cmungall closed 1 month ago

cmungall commented 1 month ago

Bower et al describe a prototypical novel element that confers extreme-distance gene activation by remote enhancers.

name: range extender element is_a: ??? DNA_motif? transcriptional_cis_regulatory_region? synonym: REX def: "A conserved cis-acting element that confers extreme-distance regulatory activity to an enhancer." [https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.26.595809]

egchristensen commented 1 month ago

What do you think of these edits @cmungall?


name: range_extender_element is_a: transcriptional_cis_regulatory_region synonym: REX def: A conserved cis-acting element that confers extreme-distance regulatory activity to an enhancer.
comment (to go under definition): On its own, a range extender element is not a classical enhancer, but its addition can extend the range of action of a heterologous short-range enhancer by more than 10-fold compared to its native range. In extreme cases, extended ranges may span approximately 840 kilobases of genomic space. The evolutionarily conserved homeodomain motif [C/T]AATA, required for long-range enhancer activity, is present within the range extender element. Range extender elements are distinct from and do not share sequence similarity with other cis-regulatory elements like tethering and remote control elements in Drosophila; or CTCF sites, CpG islands, and enhancer booster elements in mammals. Rather than conferring robustness of remote enhancer activity, a range extender element is both required and sufficient for long-range enhancer-promoter activation. database_cross_reference (to go under definition): [https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.26.595809] comment: Added at the request of Chris Mungall (Berkeley Lab). See GitHub Issue #649.


Some notes:

It appears that range extender elements contain a "DNA_motif" with sequence [C/T]AATA but Bower et al don't seem to define range extender elements just with that motif. They focus a lot on the effect it has on the action of classical enhancers so I think transcriptional_cis_regulatory_region is a good parent term.

Do we also want to include the parts of this entity in SO?

Also, does the definition of this feature need to be restricted to the development of certain anatomical features to reflect the work cited?

cmungall commented 1 month ago

great!

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 12:41 PM Evan Christensen @.***> wrote:

What do you think of these edits @cmungall https://github.com/cmungall?

name: range_extender_element is_a: transcriptional_cis_regulatory_region synonym: REX def: A conserved cis-acting element that confers extreme-distance regulatory activity to an enhancer. comment (to go under definition): On its own, a range extender element is not a classical enhancer, but its addition can extend the range of action of a heterologous short-range enhancer by more than 10-fold compared to its native range. In extreme cases, extended ranges may span approximately 840 kilobases of genomic space. The evolutionarily conserved homeodomain motif [C/T]AATA, required for long-range enhancer activity, is present within the range extender element. Range extender elements are distinct from and do not share sequence similarity with other cis-regulatory elements like tethering and remote control elements in Drosophila; or CTCF sites, CpG islands, and enhancer booster elements in mammals. Rather than conferring robustness of remote enhancer activity, a range extender element is both required and sufficient for long-range enhancer-promoter activation. database_cross_reference (to go under definition): [ https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.26.595809] comment: Added at the request of Chris Mungall (Berkeley Lab). See GitHub Issue #649 https://github.com/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/649.

Some notes:

It appears that range extender elements contain a "DNA_motif" with sequence [C/T]AATA but Bower et al don't seem to define range extender elements just with that motif. They focus a lot on the effect it has on the action of classical enhancers so I think transcriptional_cis_regulatory_region is a good parent term.

Do we also want to include the parts of this entity in SO?

-

Bower et al. refer to the region contained with a range extender element as "[C/T]AATA homeodomain motifs". It seems like a better label for that motif would be something along the lines of "[C/T]AATA_homeobox_motif" since homeodomains are found on amino acid sequence and not DNA sequence. "[C/T]AATA_homeobox_motif" could then be related with "range_extender_element" via a "part_of" or "contained_by" relationship.

If we add "[C/T]AATA_homeobox_motif" (or something similar) then we may want to also add a term for "homeobox" under transcriptional_cis_regulatory_region.

Also, does the definition of this feature need to be restricted to the development of certain anatomical features to reflect the work cited?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/The-Sequence-Ontology/SO-Ontologies/issues/649#issuecomment-2150823583, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOIV5Z4G64VEUHFPRBLZF5SU7AVCNFSM6AAAAABIL4M35GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJQHAZDGNJYGM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

egchristensen commented 1 month ago

Created a new term for range_extender_element with accession SO:0002382. Changes should be reflected on sequenceontology.org within 24 hours.