Open adhurjaty opened 19 hours ago
Looking at Google's engineering practices. I don't think we have to go full-corporate in terms of commit message formatting etc., but would be good to have some guidelines for contributing.
Do we want branch naming guidelines? @time.e.less had indicated feature_yourname_shortname
as his preference, should we stick with that?
I prefer working with atomic commits (no commit leaves the system in a broken state or failing tests)
Merge, rebase, or squash and merge PRs?
@Melvillian @maxtriano do you have opinions on any of these
@adhurjaty No opinion beyond that we squash and merge for PRs to main at my job and I like it, keeps main's history cleaner.
@adhurjaty No opinion beyond that we squash and merge for PRs to main at my job and I like it, keeps main's history cleaner.
I'm good with committing to that at least for now