From what can be understood, it seems we weren't properly utilizing our transposition table. It is entirely possible to get more transposition table cutoffs if we avoid checking for depth regarding move ordering. This is because the TT move may actually be the best move (even if it was only best at a shallower search.
ELO Difference
TC: 8s + 0.08s
Using UHO_XXL_+0.90_+1.19.epd:
Score of StockNemo 2.0.0.9-b227982a vs StockNemo 2.0.0.8: 199 - 66 - 123 [0.671] 388
... StockNemo 2.0.0.9-b227982a playing White: 122 - 21 - 51 [0.760] 194
... StockNemo 2.0.0.9-b227982a playing Black: 77 - 45 - 72 [0.582] 194
... White vs Black: 167 - 98 - 123 [0.589] 388
Elo difference: 124.1 +/- 29.5, LOS: 100.0 %, DrawRatio: 31.7 %
SPRT: llr 2.96 (100.4%), lbound -2.94, ubound 2.94 - H1 was accepted
Finished match
From what can be understood, it seems we weren't properly utilizing our transposition table. It is entirely possible to get more transposition table cutoffs if we avoid checking for depth regarding move ordering. This is because the TT move may actually be the best move (even if it was only best at a shallower search.
ELO Difference
TC: 8s + 0.08s
Using
UHO_XXL_+0.90_+1.19.epd
:TC: 10s + 0.1s