Closed eps1lon closed 5 years ago
Hey @eps1lon , thanks for this. Let me think a bit. If you wanted to try to bump the TypeScript to 3.1 and assign the defaults directly to waitForExpect as you suggested, so we can compare the compiled code and emited type declarations that would be great. I feel this might be a better way, and if the end-result of the transpiled code looks basically the same then I think there is little risk.
Since @kentcdodds will have to update the dependency it in the testing-library as well, I'm tagging him in case he has an opinion.
@lgandecki I'll work on an alternate and see how this looks like.
:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 3.0.1 :tada:
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:
We're using
@testing-library/dom
which uses this package and like to run tests in IE11. Unfortunately Object.assign is not available in that environment.Fortunately we can transpile it to be compatible with IE 11.
In later TypeScript versions (^3.1)
waitForExpect.defaults = defaults
would be accepted though I assumed this would be a more controversial change (bumping the TS version). See https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-1.html#properties-declarations-on-functions. I'd be happy to work on bumping TS to 3.1 if you'd prefer that.