Closed martindholmes closed 7 years ago
The House of Commons
Let me know when you need a similar list for the Indigenous sources. The RA is in the process of finalizing a list of Indigenous sources / records of negotiation, so I could only provide you with a partial list at the moment.
@DanielHeidt This looks good, but I'm not sure what the "Provincial Parliament of Canada" is -- the way it's defined makes it look like a publication rather than an actual assembly. Could you forgive my ignorance and clarify that?
@martindholmes your observation is actually very astute. The Province of Canada (Ontario and Quebec were one colony in the decades immediately preceding Confederation) each sent representatives to a Legislative Assembly and a Legislative Council. Unlike all of the other provinces, however, the colony's only verbatim record is a single book containing the discussions in both houses.
So the question is as follows: do we encode each legislature's content separately (they are already clearly demarcated with headings), or do we encode the book as a single volume? I do not currently have a clear preference either way, and would appreciate your input on which would be a more sensible approach.
@DanielHeidt I think we should identify each legislature separately; the source description in the TEI file will have full details of the source volume itself. So if I understand correctly, we actually have:
Province of Canada Legislative Assembly Province of Canada Legislative Council
and their deliberations happen to be recorded in the same publication.
@martindholmes sounds good to me
@DanielHeidt Will there be nothing from the Senate?
Also, what's a good one-sentence explanation of The Convention of 40?
We need to specify a formal list of the legislative bodies whose proceedings fall into our dataset, and assign unique identifiers to them. Dan, could you get us started with a prose list, and then we'll turn it into a taxonomy?