Closed Vampire closed 5 years ago
would it be preferable to support the UTI-based LSItemContentTypes?
Those are already supported. Do they exclude each other? Until now we had both in our plist.
According to Apple LSItemContentTypes takes precedence over CFBundleTypeOSTypes. I take that to mean that both would be useful. Would you be interested in adding these to appbundler?
Ah, well, it is deprecated since 2007 and ignored if LSItemContentTypes
is given, so let's just ignore that I said anything. :-)
bundledocument should support a comma-separated attribute that is translated to a string-array with key
CFBundleTypeOSTypes
.