Closed pnrobinson closed 5 years ago
Yes, maybe we could change terminology but this always depends on the context. For the figure this enriched would probably better.
I replaced active with enriched in the figure for the fragment size distribution. But the words active and inactive occur in many other places especially in the file prefix.count.stats.txt
and the RTD
of the count command.
I'm not sure whether it is a good idea to replace all occurrences for two reasons:
@pnrobinson : any opinion/suggestions?
We could initially say "selected (enriched)" and "unselected", and just say selected/unselected throughout the text? @hansenp
Can we use the word
enriched
instead ofactive
? It is best not to introduce new terminology if possible! For instance we need to redo the figure with the size distribution in mapping.rst.