Closed wtl420 closed 4 years ago
I realize the patron license is specifically a license for people who have already become a patron, so it's a companion to an existing license.
https://licensezero.com/licenses/parity I think this is a solid baseline copyleft license, it's fairly easy to read through and understand which makes it great. I really love the concept of "flipped form" https://flippedform.com/ licenses and want to stick with one of those.
I definitely like the idea of open source but requiring people to contribute their changes. Overall, that concept feels like potential eventual free outsourcing for QoL and feature additions, which I think is probably a net positive when it comes to long term usability down the line.
Looked more into parity and it's a no-go since it has a weird clause for open source tools that requires anything made with the tool to be under the same license, which I don't really agree with.
https://indieopensource.com/public-private/public-licenses#AGPL-3.0
AGPL seems to do what I want, unfortunately it doesn't seem like there's a flipped form variant we can use but that's all right.
Going to go with AGPL since there weren't any additional comments here. We can always change it if needed.
We should decide on a license for the software.
I want to avoid the traditional ones like MIT or GPL and try something a bit different.
https://blog.licensezero.com/2019/09/11/patron-license-1.0.0.html might be a good contender, I really like the licenses https://writing.kemitchell.com/ has come up with, and would love to use one of them.