Closed black-RAM closed 1 month ago
Maybe Adaptable doesn't need to be removed as a PaaS option and the information can be updated instead. The Ruby path deployment lesson still lists Heroku as an option even though they don't have a free tier (though I don't know if that's an oversight). Adaptable's build plan is also cheaper than Heroku's.
I know that the idea behind using PaaS sites during the curriculum is that we shouldn't be looking to pay for anything we make while following ToP though. So maybe we can keep Adaptable around until other free tier options can be added?
(Initially posted this under the wrong issue. >_<)
Frustrating, given that besides the credit card verification step, it has the most generous free tier of the options.
Personally, I feel it's time for adaptable to go since our lesson lists its recommended PaaS options, and I can't in good faith recommend a paid-only service as part of a free curriculum. In #28491, Fly.io was recently removed for the same reason.
We still have Render, Railway and Koyeb for servers/dbs and Neon for dbs, which is still sufficient so far for the curriculum. We will likely need to reconsider how this part for deployment is approached, but that's a bigger and separate discussion.
@black-RAM Assigned you to remove Adaptable.io from the Node deployment lesson
@black-RAM Assigned you to remove Adaptable.io from the Node deployment lesson
Thank you! I have made the edit and opened a pull request.
It's my first time contributing, so I'm especially happy :grin: .
Checks
Describe your suggestion
Adaptable.io has stopped offering a free tier, so it shouldn't be on the list anymore, or at least the information should be updated. Source of Screenshot They explain their decision here.
Path
Node / JS
Lesson Url
https://www.theodinproject.com/lessons/node-path-nodejs-deployment
(Optional) Discord Name
black.RAM_
(Optional) Additional Comments
No response