Open nekosoffy opened 3 weeks ago
Thanks for the suggestion, Soffy.
Personally, I feel like such a command may be a little too general in its scope if it were to cover the majority or the suggested use cases. Feels more like general FAQ command and I'd rather not have a command purely because of a commonly asked question, because some questions do benefit from a human response that's tailored to the question - a more personal touch. And this sort of question, while very common I agree, is something I just feel more "right" responding to in person than via a bot command, if that makes sense?
But that is 100% just my own opinion. Would like to hear other thoughts from @TheOdinProject/odin-bot and @TheOdinProject/moderators too.
I see where Mao coming from. We have been adding too many commands lately, and we should start pruning them a little, to not void TOP from that human interaction, that is one of the charms which make TOP unique.
I do see where this information might be helpful, maybe we can add them to one of the earliest lessons if it wasn't there to instruct people about their code cleanless / performance.
Checks
command name: brief description of request
format, e.g./help: add optional @user parameter
Do you want to be assigned to this issue?
Description of the Feature Request
Every day a user pops a message in one of the help channels with the following content: "Hey, can anybody take a look at my code and see if I've implemented it in the most perfect way possible even though I'm still in Foundations?", or some variant like "Hey, can you guys check if my code is clean/performant/how can I shorten it/I feel it's messy/it's ugly" etc.
I think it could be useful to have a bot message with some general ideas like:
Something along those lines.
Acceptance Criteria
Additional information
No response